Draft and Trade Talk Message Board
11 team roto, redraft league
Team A gets: Pujols
Team B gets: LaHair, Moustakas
Team A already has Hanley at 3B, Team B already has Headley at 3B.
Am I wrong in thinking that this trade is absolutely one sided and should be vetoed?
Because "Team A is getting a steal doesnt mean shit. If you think that team A and team B are in cahoots together then veto it.
We had a money league a few years back that saw a team who was 55-125 (or something) on the trade deadline deal Tulo for two prospects - a nonkeeper league. We all had figured that maybe the team getting Tulo gave the guy dealing Tulo 15$ of his 50$ buy-in back to have a better shot at the 500$ jackpot. THAT IS VETOABLE. but even then, we wernt sure so we never vetoed it.
You dont just veto a trade BC YOU WOULDNT HAVE DONE IT. You veto a trade when it looks like something is fishy.
People are free to make a bad trade - they dont need the trade police to tell them they made a "bad"(YOUR opinion) deal. Shame on you for not putting out an offer for Pujols earlier.
I know which side I'd want more. And I guess no veto because the LaHair owner is selling him high and Pujols is being sold low. The one giving Pujols is foolish but with the way LaHair is raking, it's not a veto.
Expert Fantasy Advice
If there were any remaining Toby Gerhart loyalists ... well, sorry. Robinson is the Jaguars RB to own. … More »
Russell Wilson had a monstrous fantasy game during Seattle's losing effort and an examination of the rest of the Week 7 action … More »