Boxing Experts Blog - Boxing

Bernard Hopkins was beaming in Atlantic City back in October when he downed the much younger Kelly Pavlik. Little did he know that dominant win could be his swan song. At 44 years old, Hopkins is only going to take a big money fight, but the choices are slim and BHop says he's getting the lionshare of the money or he won't fight the likes of Chad Dawson, Tomasz Adamek or even Antonio Tarver. That's right. Tarver a huge underdog tonight against Dawson, would certainly make for a big rematch against Hopkins (49-5-1, 32 KOs), if he puts in a rousing victory.

Hopkins says he's ready to fight someone in September but the terms have to be right:

"I'm not waiting on nobody," Hopkins told Yahoo! Sports. "If it ain't set up by at least June or July, whoever it is, then it's a wrap. It's a done deal. What's the purpose? If a guy's 44 years old, they should be beating his door down."

Listen to Hopkins talk about Dawson and Adamek (2:45 mark):

Hopkins claims that Dawson wants a 50-50 split. Dawson told ESPNRadio1100 on Friday that's not the case:

"We haven't even talked about money. No one's even mentioned anything about money. Let's just fight man. Stop all the bullcrap. I go to the ratings, they have Bernard rated above me. He's one, I'm two. Don't you think one and two should fight? The money will be good for both of us. Let's just fight."

Now word is leaking out that Hopkins is throwing the name Felix Trinidad into the mix. Huh? That set off Keith Idec of the North Jersey Herald:

(Hopkins') penchant for trying to peddle fiction as indisputable fact has become rather ridiculous. No one other than Hopkins, Trinidad and Don King, Trinidad’s promoter, has any interest in seeing Hopkins-Trinidad II.

How, exactly, could this warrant a rematch?

And why does Hopkins think he can conveniently dismiss higher-risk, higher-reward fights against Dawson or cruiserweight champion Tomasz Adamek in trying to convince everyone that a Trinidad rematch matters?

Idec is right but it's all part of Hopkins' negotiating games. We're not exactly sure why the games are needed with Dawson. If he wins tonight, he sounds like he's going to be pretty reasonable to try and seal a deal with Hopkins. At that point, the ball's in BHop's court. Does he really want to play with the 26-year-old Dawson?

digg delicious
more

26 Comments

Post a Comment
  1. Ronnie G
    1. Posted by Ronnie G Sat May 09, 2009 11:46 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    i think hopkins and dawson is the ideal match, hopefully they can make it happen. i really like dawson, but if b-hop looks anything like he did against pavlik, i'd say a 12 unanimous for the experienced battle tested hopkins.
  2. MMA Man
    2. Posted by MMA Man Sun May 10, 2009 12:52 am EDT

    Report Abuse

    Dawson would mop up B-Hop in 11 rds. He's beaten Tarver twice now and even beat Johnson. Bernard should retire at 44. Dawson is way too fast and he can punch.
  3. Nathan T
    3. Posted by Nathan T Sun May 10, 2009 1:11 am EDT

    Report Abuse

    Bernard is wily, but Dawson is a hell of a lot quicker and more solid than Pavlik is, Pavlik knocks out middleweight wannabes. Dawson would probably make him look 44 and eventually win by TKO in 10.
  4. JJ
    4. Posted by JJ Sun May 10, 2009 1:59 am EDT

    Report Abuse

    BHOP is one of the greatest fighters in history, Chad Dawson would get smoked! And people stop talking about BHOP being to old he got hosed in the 1st J.Taylor fight and there would have never been a rematch, you saw what he did to the much youger Pavlik, and Calzaghe as HOP said after the fight "my sister hits harder" Joe throws alot of slaps and never hurt Bernard. BHOP did knock down that scrub. My money will always be on Hopkins whom ever he fights, BHOP has won me alot of $ over the years and for what ever reason he is always plus money
  5. radditz25
    5. Posted by radditz25 Sun May 10, 2009 2:20 am EDT

    Report Abuse

    personally, i think Hopkins should fight Glen Johnson. that is a great matchup. besides this article there are so many other fight matchups i can name that would be very interesting. boxing needs good matchups right now. some of these fights are too redundant.
  6. Mr.Brooks
    6. Posted by Mr.Brooks Sun May 10, 2009 10:18 am EDT

    Report Abuse

    The reason Hopkins dosent want Dawson has nothing to do with money imo. I pick Dawson ..I do hope they fight... (not like I have never been wrong before)
  7. Mr.Brooks
    7. Posted by Mr.Brooks Sun May 10, 2009 10:25 am EDT

    Report Abuse

    The reason Hopkins dosent want Dawson has nothing to do with money imo. I pick Dawson ..I do hope they fight... (not like I have never been wrong before) I havent seen the Pavlik fight though.. sorry if this shows up as double post..
  8. Busta
    8. Posted by Busta Sun May 10, 2009 10:35 am EDT

    Report Abuse

    Chad is made for Bhop, styles make fights and Chad has that style that will make Bhop look young. Dawson didn't do anything impressive against Tarver, if he want to be considered one of the best he has to step his game up and fight tall, I like Dawson but he didn't look like anything special against a overrated Tarver, I'll take Bhop all day against Chad.
  9. Cody B
    9. Posted by Cody B Sun May 10, 2009 1:10 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    B-Hop's grittyness and defensive prowess cant be overlooked. Chad looked incredibly quick and powerful lastnight, but he was fighting a garbage antonio tarver. Lets not forget about Chad's chin. glass...
  10. LIPS
    10. Posted by LIPS Sun May 10, 2009 1:29 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    b-hop would piss on dawson. so would calzaghe. these guys make me laugh. and froch...lmao...calzaghe would f his mother...on mother's day. guys like dawson and froch are not draws. sadly, peter manfredo jr. is more of a draw than chad dawson.
  11. LIPS
    11. Posted by LIPS Sun May 10, 2009 1:32 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    no offense, but if anyone here thinks dawson belongs in the ring with hopkins or calzaghe, you just don't know boxing. b-hop would outcraft him easily and calzaghe would make him look like a bad sparring partner.
  12. Da_Bay_Beast
    12. Posted by Da_Bay_Beast Sun May 10, 2009 2:25 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    I agree. B-Hop would take the youngsta to school. The only good part of that fight for Chad would be the Kelly Pavlik peptalk he'd get after the fight is over.
  13. Grant
    13. Posted by Grant Sun May 10, 2009 3:47 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    That Tarver Dawson fight was maybe the most boring fight in the history of anyone fighting for a championship...Those two guys couldn't give away a pay for View. The sport needs more Jones, Hopkins, Calzaghe, and Mayweathers of the world... No wonder MMA is more popular. They have personalities....Boxing doesn't.
  14. Jessica K
    14. Posted by Jessica K Sun May 10, 2009 9:56 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Did anyone notice how lazy tarver's jab was. An elite fighter would have noticed that after two rounds, countered over top of it and knocked him out. Dawson is not an elite fighter and hopkins is a legend who fogot more about boxing than dawson will ever learn. Hopkins would ruin Dawson's career forever if they fought.
  15. 758656
    15. Posted by 758656 Sun May 10, 2009 10:09 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    I respect both Tarver and Dawson as fighters, but that fight last night made me wanna cry and go watch the replay of Malignaggi-Hatton (which was also horrible). Hopefully WHEN Mayweather beats JM Marquez and Pacquiao, boxing will have some respect back. There's no one quite like Floyd and i had to mention his name a couple times to shed some sort of light on that bad night of boxing. The undercards looked like a real classic too. I'm shocked fightnews.com actually posted pictures of SOME of those other fighters.
  16. Gary N
    16. Posted by Gary N Sun May 10, 2009 11:19 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    Hopkins is a very good fighter,but dawson would come out with the w.only one thing thou if hopkins did lose to dawson,he would lose to a fighter that will be the new champ for many years to come.which aint realy a bad thing thou.it"s time for hopkins to retire,and how better to retire by losing to a extremly good fighter in dawson.get ready to start hearing alot more about chad /lightning strikes/dawson.lights out people!!!you better believe it!!!
  17. The Tip
    17. Posted by The Tip Mon May 11, 2009 7:59 am EDT

    Report Abuse

    Hopkins already beat Glen Johnson
  18. boxingexpert
    18. Posted by boxingexpert Mon May 11, 2009 9:33 am EDT

    Report Abuse

    I believe having watched boxing now for a very long time and having picked 85% of winners in the big fights that i have a good track record as to give an informed opinion of who would win between Dawson and Hopkins. Please remember more than 50 % of people who saw Chad vs Glen Johnson say that Johnson outworked Chad and should have been given the decision. And Glen is an old wiley veteran much like Hopkins. Chad is very open and very careless when he goes in. Tarver just doesnt have the fire power anymore to knock out a sack of potatoes. Hopkins would make it a boring fight but would probably be even up until the later rounds where Hopkins would take over in the tenth and eleventh rounds to squeak out a tough decision since I saw Chad tire early against Tarver. And Hopkins at 44 is in better condition than the Spartan army in 300.
  19. boxingexpert
    19. Posted by boxingexpert Mon May 11, 2009 9:38 am EDT

    Report Abuse

    Btw i dont think Mayweather will beat JMM. beleive it or not Marquez is a great boxer and on par with Manny P. Remember Manny did not look that impressive against him. Based on Mayweather's performance at JMM we should know whether or not he could beat Manny P. Since JMM is a Mexican version of Manny Pacquiao.
  20. Gunner Star
    20. Posted by Gunner Star Mon May 11, 2009 11:33 am EDT

    Report Abuse

    Man how long have you guys been into boxing? Do you not remember the tail kickins that he got back in the day. He isn't great. Who has he fought? Floyd is going to destroy him!
  21. rightbrain74
    21. Posted by rightbrain74 Mon May 11, 2009 5:30 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    boxingexpert, how is jmm a mexican version of pacquiao? their styles are very different. jmm is conventional, slower, and a very intelligent counter puncher. pacquiao is a southpaw with great speed and quickness who has improved greatly over the past couple years, but is not as much of a thinker in the ring. he relies on his athletic ability and speed and carries out brilliant game plans that his trainer freddie roach comprises. also, styles make fights so even if mayweather struggles with marquez (who wouldn't), it doesn't necessarily mean he would struggle and/or lose to pac. personally, i don't think anybody runs through marquez or pac. just be happy with a w over those guys. my money is on mayweather to beat them both because i've never seen a better boxer.
  22. Potter
    22. Posted by Potter Thu Aug 06, 2009 4:51 pm EDT

    Report Abuse

    end of part one.

Boxing Experts Blog

Add to My Yahoo! RSS

Related Photo Gallery

Blog Roll

Yahoo! Sports Blog Recent Readers