YOUR FRIENDS' ACTIVITY

    Discover Yahoo! With Your Friends

    Explore news, videos, and much more based on what your friends are reading and watching. Publish your own activity and retain full control.

    To get started, first
    Busted Racquet

    Federer stumbles, loses again to Nadal in Grand Slam showdown

    (Getty Images)

    Roger Federer didn't have a Rafael Nadal problem on Thursday night at the Australian Open, he had a Roger Federer problem.

    The 16-time Grand Slam champion was plagued by inconsistent groundstrokes, periods of malaise and a puzzling game plan in a 6-7 (5), 6-2, 7-6 (5), 6-4 loss to his longtime rival.

    Nadal played spectacular tennis for the first two sets, losing a tight tiebreaker then dominating the second frame, before adopting a more defensive strategy that pressed Federer into making mistakes. The world No. 3 obliged.

    Federer hit 63 unforced errors in the match, including a lazy overhead at the baseline that sailed wide on a break point opportunity in the final game. He had trouble putting away points that should have been his, then went for winners when he should have been content to let things play out. Early in the match he was fond of coming to the net and closing off one side of the court, leaving the rest wide open for Rafa to hit a passing shot. Its implementation was bizarre. Sticking with it when Nadal exposed its flaws was suicidal.

    The loss was a devastating blow to Federer, who entered the showdown on a 24-match win streak. The last time he played Nadal at Rod Laver Arena, he lost a five-set heartbreaker. He shed tears after that match and pundits wondered whether the game had passed him by. Though he's 30 now, the same question won't be asked after this loss. Despite those lows, Federer hung around even when it felt like Nadal was pulling away.

    [Related: Ballboy makes incredible grab during Federer-Nadal match]

    The match's momentum shifts were dizzying. Federer was in vintage form in bursting out to a 3-0 lead. He quickly cooled before pulling out a first-set tiebreak. Nadal was in control of the second set and worked the 10-minute break for the Australia Day fireworks to his advantage, winning 11 straight points following the delay to take a 1-0, 40-0 lead in the third set. Federer held off those three break points and evened the match.

    Even then, though, with the match still tied, Nadal felt in control. A moment later Federer broke Nadal and, just as quickly, Nadal broke him back. Back to even. In the third-set tiebreak, Rafa went up 5-1. Cruising. Then Roger got it back to 6-5 before dropping the set.

    Back and forth it went in the fourth and final set. Losing the third figured to be the death knell for Federer, yet he earned three late break point opportunities, including one at 4-5 that he lost because of a freakish Nadal lob that somehow landed on the baseline. Federer had been expecting the shot to sail long. When it didn't, he hit a half-hearted overhead that sailed wide and evened the game at deuce. If Nadal's lob goes one inch farther, Federer extends the match again.

    The reason Federer cried last time is because he was entering a tennis unknown. Then, he was the top player in the world who had just been bested on a different surface by the man who would dethrone him. Where would Roger Federer go from there?

    This time, there is no great mystery about what happens to Fed. His path is clear. He'll continue contending in Grand Slams and will break through and win a couple when the draws and conditions allow. His off days, like Thursday, are still better than 95 percent of other players' good days. He is who he is, a great champion in winter. He's not going anywhere and isn't done winning Slams. As long as he stays consistent -- the man hasn't missed a Slam quarterfinal since May of 2004 -- he'll always be a contender. Another loss to Rafael Nadal doesn't change that.

    Nadal will face the winner of the Novak Djokovic-Andy Murray match in Sunday's final.

    Other popular content on Yahoo! Sports:
    Teen tennis star Bernard Tomic's run-in with Australian police
    Dunk of the year candidate: OK State's Markel Brown earns ejection
    Pats' holy trinity: Tom Brady, Bob Kraft and Bill Belichick

     
    • kevon  •  Ocala, Florida  •  3 months ago
      I am convinced that Federer is just a #$%$ he had the match, but keep on making juvenile errors after errors. In his mind he see the spaniard as a huge wall he cannot climb... He started off so strongly but then started to think. He need to play his game and basic tennis, as far I as I know he is much better than he appears on court facing the spaniard....again he has disappointed his fans. He is just a #$%$..
      • chris 3 months ago
        Much better than he appears on court against the Spaniard??? He's 2-8 against Rafa in majors and 9-18 overall. Apparently, he's not better than he appears on court.
    • yevgeny  •  3 months ago
      Age has nothing to do with this, I am a huge RF fan, bottom line Nadal lives in RF's head and isnt moving out any time soon! RF created Nadal and his incredible passing shots since he gives up on points he thinks already won only to be passed by Nadal........
    • Jon  •  3 months ago
      I am not Federer fan at all but I do think this still shows that the argument cannot be made that Roger is the best of all time, but that shouldn't diminish his amazing accomplishments in the world of tennis. Still don't understand why Fed would care if he's considered that I would just go out there and play have fun and be satisfied at 30 yrs old that he's healthy and not forced to retire.
      • Dick Dong 3 months ago
        it's his H U G E ego... he'll retire by the end of this year because he'll have trouble making it to the quarters in every tourney, you'll see...
      • Jono Loves Bacon 3 months ago
        Whats Rafa's record against Federer in Slam even lately? 8-2? 9-2?
        this isnt the sign of a great rivalry, Rafa owns him and is living in his head.

        of course, Nole is not only living in Rafa's head, he's added an extra room and renovated the kitchen.

        best of all time is like arguing which ice cream is best.
        best of his generation is a little easier to gauge but Federer was unbeatable when Rafa broke through and now its the other way around so I cant say that either is the best of their generation and if Nole keeps playing the way he does with the same mental focus, we will end up saying that he and Rafa where the best of their generation (not sure I would consider all three to be of the same generation) and we will never have a clear cut best.
        i cant wait to see how Rafa does this time around. i find it fascinating that Nole just turned on the switch last season and want to see if he has worked on his mental game this winter.
      • kurt 3 months ago
        How can anyone respect someone who needs to be coached by his uncle at every match (even tho' it is supposed to be prohibited) and pulls stunts like taking too much time between serves? He's obviously doping and pretending to be injured during and prior to matches. The players are supposed to be thinking for themselves and not trying to intimidate other players by having their coaches stand up in their boxes and blatantly yell out corrections. Did you ever see matches where Uncle Tony was not there?? Rafa is totally confused and lost. Roger would never take this low road - he would rather suffer the losses.
    • Rick  •  Hastings, Minnesota  •  3 months ago
      he cruises though all the opponents, then hits Nadal or Djokovich, and boom collapse..In the U.S. Open he had double match point on HIS own serve and blew it against Djokovich..the same thing the year before and the year before that against Del Potro..it is inside his head not the other players where he is losing....he is still the greatest ever, but can he overcome himself?.
    • MB  •  3 months ago
      Hats off to Nadal. He earned it. I was pulling hard for Federer. I think
      Nadal has his number. His strategy was sound at first but then slowly
      vanished. Good luck in the future RF, you're still the greatest.
    • Lance  •  3 months ago
      Roger...retire...or accept being # 3...
    • AlfaCowboy  •  Omaha, Nebraska  •  3 months ago
      I generally resist joining in the Chris Chase criticism, but sometimes the guy is just too awful. Ignoring the fact that he writes like a sixth grader, his premise is just not valid. "Roger Federer didn't have a Rafael Nadal problem ... " Really? Roger Federer clearly does have a Rafael Nadal problem, one that's lasted for several years. Despite Fed's groupies' silly hairsplitting arguments about playing surfaces, Nadal simply owns Federer. Has, does, will. Fed has great game, and he's one of the best ever, but watching his sycophantic fans (like Chase, Evert and that ancient elitist, Laver) sloppily and audibly fellate him makes me hope his Prettiness retires shortly. Keep abusing the Pretty One, Rafa. His fans deserve it.
    • reader  •  3 months ago
      Time for a game shift Roger...
    • gregory  •  Ypsilanti, Michigan  •  3 months ago
      federer cant handle the rafa topspin . rafa covers too much court and federer does not have the legs to match it!
    • RandyS  •  Irvine, California  •  3 months ago
      I don't really know what fans expect. Fed has not been at his best since 2007 and he's 30 years old. It happens to all the players eventually... Laver, Sampras, Rosewall, Evert, Moody, etc... they could still play great at times when older but over a 6 or 7 match tournament the players 5 or more years younger wear them down. Federer is still number 3 or 4 in the world but that ranking will continue to fall as he passes into the twilight of his career.
    • clifford  •  Anchorage, Alaska  •  3 months ago
      some of the comments are right on! roger may challenege for another slam, only if novak or rafa get injured ..but for the time being, he's playing for 2nd 3rd like others did when tiger was on a roll, like for 10 years just as fed was..i could barely watch after the first set, thought he was going to dismantle rafa but he tried doing some dumb strategy that just sent him over the edge an rafa to the final...roger is a great champion but he's being owned an all the comparisons don't matter, roger's record speaks for itself..rafa's slam numbers may increase if he can get by the jokester or murray whom i wish would have a break thru an not end up like andy roddick
      • Jadon S 3 months ago
        Nadal's problem is the same way like fed's one. He is lacking of confidence against novak. Especially since the miami's final when he lost. That one also got away from him should of won that. I just think like uncle toni said, nadal is spooked out by nole on the court. It make him play more passive and less aggressive when he is up against nole. Just look on Wimbledon final? Nadal do have the game to beat nole, he just don't execute it right. He is too stubborn. Still medium slow hc usually favor nadal. Since it's a outdoor one. Federer usually own nadal indoor where he is 4-0
    • Medinensis  •  Palm Beach, Florida  •  3 months ago
      I can't stand Federer. He's such a whiny egotistical wuss. Recently he brushed off the fact that Nadal has such a great record against him by saying:

      "It is what it is. At the end I care about my titles, if I'm happy or not as a person. Head-to-heads for me, I mean, are not the most important. If I beat Andre [Agassi] 10 times in a row or Lleyton [Hewitt] many times in a row, at the end of the day I don't care."

      Well, to me what is so obvious is recently how Federer has been talking up the players he beat at the beginning of his career.

      He beat Agassi 8 straight times after Agassi had turned 33.

      Agassi was 35 in the USO final, 1 set all and up a break. He was a 35 year old baseliner on a fast court.

      I think Agassi deserves a whole lot more respect than to be dragged into a 'rivalry' conversation about matches that happened during his mid 30's.

      In an interview before facing Nalandian at Wimbledon, he stated how much he likes facing the great players from his era like Hewitt, Roddick, Nalbandian etc.

      I think I know why
      • Runner 3 months ago
        Good points Medinensis. He likes playing people he can beat and not the top 3 (Nadal, Novak and Murray).
    • RafaHatersAreGay  •  3 months ago
      Nadal has federer's number. Sad but true.
    • Mike S  •  Eugene, Oregon  •  3 months ago
      Nadal had some incredibly lucky/blindfolded type strikes that came through right at the clutch time while Federer could not finish of his rallies nor could he get his head straight after Nadal caught him with so many "impossible" strikes. In the end, it came down to one guy coming through clutch with the other guy seeming to always play catch up and have all the momentum, only to fail at that prime clutch moment. One thing I noticed is Federer has to keep the ball in play to beat Nadal. If he only continues to play and play, Nadal will force the error eventually. Federer shouldn't cry, Djokovic will beat Nadal, so he's not one player, but two players behind the front of the pack;).
    • Josh K  •  Cheney, Washington  •  3 months ago
      Best rivalry in men's tennis, ever.
      Both are great.
      Too bad we all have to age.
      I have to say I am impressed by Djocovic's(?) rise a few years back

      It's a good time to be a tennis fan.
    • Ray75  •  3 months ago
      The way Fed played those first three games makes me wonder how he ends up losing...that was hurricane-like. Maybe its difficult to maintain but with that kind of talent I dont understand why he ends up losing.
    • mark  •  St Louis, Missouri  •  3 months ago
      The camera shots were absolutly AMAZING! I hope he/she works the superbowl.
    • Dan  •  El Segundo, California  •  3 months ago
      including one a 4-5....consistence....do Yahoo have access to an on line gramerr checker and speell checker?
    • Jeff  •  3 months ago
      ((( Fire Chris Chase )))
    • Sun_Train  •  Washington, District of Columbia  •  3 months ago
      No battle plan survives the contact with the enemy. Come on. The guy is over 30, arguably on the decline of his amazing career, but still competes on a high level with Nadal and Djokovic? At the end of the day, we'll see if Nadal wins more slams than Fed - that will be a convincing argument to a Fed fan. But realistically we won't know that until a few years down the road, because I believe Fed has the staying power.

      A great champion won't become full of himself while at his peak, nor despair at his low. Go Feb for a champion’s heart!

    Yahoo! Sports Authors

    Regular Contributors:

    Patrick Mouratoglou