YOUR FRIENDS' ACTIVITY

    Discover Yahoo! With Your Friends

    Explore news, videos, and much more based on what your friends are reading and watching. Publish your own activity and retain full control.

    To get started, first
    Puck Daddy

    Analysis: Jeff Carter for Jack Johnson deal a royal coup for Kings, conditional success for Jackets

    Getty

    "The Columbus Blue Jackets have acquired defenseman Jack Johnson and the Los Angeles Kings' first-round selection in either 2012 or 2013 for forward Jakub Voracek, the eighth-overall pick in the 2011 draft and a third-round pick in the 2011 draft …"

    Read that again. Digest it. Stripped of context and conditions, and taken at face value, it wouldn't be a bad trade for the Columbus Blue Jackets, given that Voracek was an RFA and Johnson is signed through 2018 with a $4,357,143 cap hit.

    Plus, he played in the Big 10! Just for the wrong colors, in Buckeye country.

    Alas, that's not how it played out. The Jackets shipped that latter package to the Philadelphia Flyers last summer for Jeff Carter; on Thursday, they moved Carter to the Kings for the former package, ending an injury-plagued, innuendo-laden 39-game career in Columbus.

    Johnson's a good defenseman. Hell, he's the most talented offensive defenseman the Jackets have ever had on the roster. On special teams, he'll be a revelation: He had 28 points on the power play last season; that's a higher total than any Columbus player since David Vyborny's 32 power-play points in 2005-06.

    What Jack Johnson is not: a No. 1 center. That's what Columbus GM Scott Howson traded for last summer, saying, "We've never had a No. 1 center in Columbus and now we have one and are thrilled."

    Yeah, about that …

    The problem is that the Jackets traded for Carter about a week before they traded for the negotiating rights for James Wisniewski and then signed him to a 6-year, $33 million contract. With Johnson, the Blue Jackets now have two very good but not great defensemen that are better known for their offense than their defense. This is problematic when (a) keeping the puck out of the net has been the season's greatest failing and (b) the team is fourth from last in offense.

    The Rick Nash trade, when it happens, will likely rectify the No. 1 center issue, whether it's Brandon Dubinsky from the Rangers or Joe Pavelski from the Sharks or some other asset coming back for the captain. But that's trading a top line wing for (presumably) a top-line center; and will any semblance of defensive defense or goaltending come back for Nash after it had no home in the Carter trade?

    Personnel wise, Blue Jackets fans can be understandably pleased about this Carter deal. He had to go, and Howson got a first-round pick and a significant roster player for him — a better one than, say, Trevor Daley, whom the Dallas Stars were rumored to have anted up. Taken as a whole, the Voracek/Johnson trade described above is a win for Howson.

    Philosophically, though, it's maddening. A presumptive No. 1 center was traded for an offensive defenseman, which is a redundancy after Wisniewski's signing. It's an indictment of how far off the rails this franchise's plans have rolled.

    GettyFor the Los Angeles Kings, let's start with the obvious:

    Jeff Carter. Mike Richards. Los Angeles. Party rock is in the house.

    The best hope here is that these two Dry Islanders have received a hell of an education in the last year; the Flyers' deconstruction of their locker room snapping them into some burgeoning level of maturity and comprehension of consequences.

    GM Dean Lombardi believes that Carter's character issues have been overblown. There's also reason to believe that Carter's in more of a comfort zone in LA than he ever was in Columbus: From Richards to Simon Gagne to assistant coach John Stevens, who coached Carter in the AHL and NHL, to Ron Hextall, who was with the Flyers when Carter came through the system.

    Here's Lombardi on the trade:

    As Lombardi said, the Kings are strong down the middle. Carter's a natural center but can play wing. But most importantly, he's going to be asked to snipe with frequency rather be a supportive pivot to a scoring winger, which was the awkward relationship with Nash in Columbus. More on Carter here from Mayor's Manor, before the trade.

    Meanwhile … Slava Voynov just popped the champagne.

    The 22-year-old Russian rookie will slide up and take Johnson's minutes on the blueline, which is one of the reasons Johnson was expendable.

    Another reason: Because he's Jack Johnson. He's been mentioned in trade proposals and rumors for the last two years. He's well-liked, has tremendous potential, but was never considered an untouchable, even after inking his long-term deal. Lombardi himself had been public in his frustrations at times.

    But perhaps the most important reason: Dean Lombardi's trying to save his job.

    Rudy Kelly thinks it's a false narrative, but we're in Year Six of the Lombardi regime and we've seen more Kings head coaches (5) than we've seen playoff victories (4) in that time.

    He's slowly pushed his chips into the middle of the table, through free-agent signings and two blockbuster trades for former Flyers. Now, he gets Jeff Carter for half the asking price of Rick Nash — rumored to be a frontline player, two prospects and a first-round pick — and for a much smaller cap hit ($5,272,727 to $7,800,000).

    Carter tallied 115 goals from 2008-2011. The Kings could be Michael Fassbender with a fistful of roofies and they still couldn't score. To add this sniper to that roster is a coup for Lombardi.

    It's a trade that will help the Jackets and the Kings. But while it adds to the awkward reconstruction of a crumbled franchise in Columbus, it pushes the Los Angeles Kings closer to a Stanley Cup than they were with Jack Johnson and an muted offensive attack.

    Some additional reading:

    L.A. Kings Hockey for Women on JJ: "You came to us from Minnesota and you played for U of Michigan. The cold was all you knew until the Kings! I hope that the familiar will help you with this transition. I hope that Columbus knows what a true hockey lover you are. You played over 20 mins a night for the Kings and when Drew Doughty was out injured, you stepped up and shined! I hope for you and Ohio that you will shine for them and they will appreciate you as we have. But remember, we have never taken you for granted."

    Eric Cooney of Pro Sports Blogging: "Kings.  Need.  Goals.  Jeff Carter has a history of scoring those things.  He's now reunited with his cohort Richards and hopefully will get some chemistry going.  The Kings top-6 looks much sexier (not in a literal sense, although I'm sure some might feel that way) with Carter's name in the fold.  Carter can play the wing or center (like they need more of those).  Carter is not a playmaker, he's a GOAL SCORER.  Have I mentioned the Kings need goals?"

    From Mike MacLean on The Cannon: "To be honest I'm happy that this deal doesn't involve Jonathan Bernier. I think it's about time the Jackets focused on acquiring an experienced goaltender, rather than going on potential alone. Bernier has the talent, that much is known, but he barely plays and has yet to fill the role of number one goaltender."

     

    80 comments

    • EyeCyou82  •  Jersey City, New Jersey  •  2 months ago
      Colombus should have got Jonathan Bernier in this deal. They are foolish. Steve Mason is crap compared to what Bernier will become when he gets out of the Jonathan Quick situation that has stalled his career. To bad others aren't able to see this. Most notably COLOMBUS.
      • AnthoneW 2 months ago
        i agree with what you said completely. HOWEVER its "columbus" not "colombus", u idoit...
      • Chau 2 months ago
        I would have been fine with Bernier for Carter straight up but not Bernier and a first.
      • FYI 2 months ago
        Agreed Bernier has been in the shadows and he has great potential. Never had a real chance to shine yet. We could very well see him traded before Monday for another winger or for that matter Brown could go too. If I am Lombardi I would still be shopping!
    • hgdan  •  Los Angeles, California  •  2 months ago
      Top 6 forwards for LA now is Kopi, Brown, Williams, Richards, Carter, Penner.. can we score goals now? I hope so, then the bottom 2 lines that might interchange are Stoll, Lotki, Clifford, Lewis, Nolan, Richardson, with King, Fraser, and Westgarth, man we need to score more goals now, our Defense and Goaltending is fine, no excuse to missing the playoffs now
      • michael 2 months ago
        lokti was sent to manchester
      • hgdan 2 months ago
        that's right, Lotki gone, he just needs to drink milk and get bigger and faster so he can better handle the physical play
    • MstrB  •  2 months ago
      As a Kings fan, Me so Vyborny
      • K M 2 months ago
        I'll tell you who is Vyborny...Richie and Carter - they are going to chase some SERIOUS tail in LA.
      • bigjohnstudd 2 months ago
        Wet island... am i right?
    • Bonzopookie  •  Boston, Massachusetts  •  2 months ago
      I'd like to know what the Rangers are going to throw in to claim Rick Nash so easily. It sure as hell isn't going to be Brandon Dubinsky alone! Um, no thanks....I'd rather go another 11 years without a center, then deal Nash straight up for Dubinsky! And a few Rangers scrubs to soften the pot, aren't going to cut it either!
      • EyeCyou82 2 months ago
        You have got to be kidding me. The Rangers aren't giving anyone for Nash. Not even Dubinsky alone. The Rangers do not need or want Nash and are a better team without him. Not likely Nash is going anywhere with his Cap hit and asking price anyway. F Nash.
      • JB 2 months ago
        No, the rumors are the Jackets want a blue chip prospect, a pick, and a D-man plus Dubinsky for Nash
      • DC 2 months ago
        And the Rangers have already taken most of their blue chip prospects off the board. Dubi and the pick for sure. (Though this article said Dubi playing 1st line center, hahahaha) The Rangers then want to give up Thomas and probably Dylan McIlrath. Thomas is a goal scorer but on the small side. Not sure Columbus would take Mac, they'd probably want Erixon at least. The Rangers say he's untouchable but that I don't buy. I think they're just holding him back and will throw him in at the last minute. I'm honestly against trading for Nash because I don't think he's worth that contract even without giving up players for him. He's worth more to Columbus than he is any other team. He has an elite salary and no elite production to back it up. Just like at his last 5 seasons. It's bad enough the Rangers are overpaying for Richard's and Gaborik's production.
    • Stouty McPorter  •  2 months ago
      Jeff Carter is the final nail in Dean Lombardi's coffin.
      • MICHAEL 2 months ago
        I hope you are wrong. I fear you are right!
      • Bonk McKlonge 2 months ago
        Power of Attorney is right.
    • crosby  •  Toronto, Canada  •  2 months ago
      Carter, Nash, both overpaid and over rated players. Not saying they arent skilled obviously. They can put up 50-60 points a season. At that price though, how are players like Malkin, Sedins, etc. not making like 12-15million? Where does it end.
    • marc adler  •  Newport Beach, California  •  2 months ago
      Kings need goals. And have for 2 or 3 years. And that you hear from Lombardi as well as everyone else, so how does he have a job & no one holds him responsible for trading away 40 plus goal scorer Mike Cammaleri?
    • Nucks in 7  •  Vancouver, Canada  •  2 months ago
      ha...sounds like la will get to keep this year's pick and give columbus their pick in 2013 when the la pick will suck because la will be higher in the standings in 2013. smart cookies in la. give columbus their pick when they have had time to get better.
    • Fakename70  •  2 months ago
      Not bad, Lombardi, not bad. We'll see how things sort out in the playoffs, though.
    • BDenton93013  •  Carpinteria, California  •  2 months ago
      If Carter quits sulking on the ice now, if he and Richards put the plug in the jug come playoff time, if both of them can make LA into a team with two legitimate scoring lines, if Voynov keeps on playing large amounts of minutes and doesn't tire down the stretch, if Voynov avoids sophomore slump, if Doughty keeps on playing like he is now... if Snooki Panoozi can brave New Jersey without makeup... if Lindsey Lohan avoids the nose candy... lots of if's here for LA.
    • SledgeNSnafu  •  Surfside, California  •  2 months ago
      GO KINGS...........STFU to the fans who like to hate.................worry about beating the rangers philly fan....carter and Richards will score and party like every single fuuken pro athlete!........ you idiots!
    • Shellfish  •  Newtown, Pennsylvania  •  2 months ago
      Lomabrdi, like the BJ GM weren't paying attention - the Flyers dumped Upshall and Lupal as they (plus Carter and Richards) were the Party Four - when that failed and Carter and Richzards screwed their team by swimming off "Dry Island" and not staying sober for a play-off run, Snider told Holmie to dump the shore-drinking,college girl-screwing, drive at 70 MPH and laugh at little kids seeking autographs jagovs. Kings are screwed as they are stuck with them, for 10 years.
    • Brian  •  2 months ago
      Michigan is in the CCHA. There is no Big 10 Hockey Conference (yet)
    • A Yahoo! User  •  Toronto, Canada  •  2 months ago
      columbus should trade Nash for Suter and reunite the USA D (J,J And Suter) line that was so good in the olympics
    • uh.... Erik  •  Los Angeles, California  •  2 months ago
      So L.A. traded Schenn, Simmonds, JJ a 1st and a second for Richards and Carter. Perhaps a bit much, but not too shabby. The Caps, who probably needed him as much or more (having not had a 2C in like years) should've and could've given up a bit more.
    • keaton  •  Stockton, California  •  2 months ago
      The Kings got better by this trade by not only getting Carter but also *sigh* getting rid of Johnson. Playing against Johnson has definitely helped the Kings' division rivals at one point or another.. all of the underlying statistics point to JJ as being a pretty horrible defenseman all the way around, except for the power play, but there honestly isn't a whole lot to be excited about if you're a Blue Jackets fan. Then again, his new role on a new team may change things, but I just can't see that happening in Columbus.
    • Zimmy  •  Delaware, Ohio  •  2 months ago
      The problem with the Jackets: They always have decent 3rd and 4th lines, but they can't seem to accumulate enough superior players to match other teams' top 2 lines. They always have 3 decent defensemen but not enough superior defensemen that would play on the top defensive pair on good teams. That their payroll is $64M (6th highest in the league) and they have such a bad team speaks to the absolute failure of upper management. Johnson might be the best overall defenseman the Jackets have ever had. Losing Carter isn't a real loss because they didn't get much out of him. The Carter debacle again speaks more for the ineptitude of upper management than a gain/loss for the Jackets.
    • Ian B  •  Columbus, Ohio  •  2 months ago
      Anyone know the conditions of the draft pick? What makes it 2012 vs 2013? Seems like no one has mentioned it. Carter took the Jackets from bad to awful, if he does the same to the Kings the Jackets could end up with a top 5 pick in 2013.
    • NICk  •  Pleasanton, California  •  2 months ago
      I'm pretty sure the Sharks won't trade for Nash. Maybe the Rangers, but not the Sharks. Doug Wilson's spent too much time building that core group--of which all the pieces Columbus is asking for are a part--to shatter it for Nash. A great player, and one who would click exceptionally well with Thornton, but I don't think Wilson will be willing to lose a core player now, then lose another core player once Nash's salary is fully on the books. They can afford him right now because of how they've managed their cap, but next year they'd be on the hook for all of it, instead of 1/3 of it.
    • fiveredapples  •  Irvine, California  •  2 months ago
      The Kings made out like bandits. Jack Johnson is who, again? Tell me he's an elite D-man. Tell me he's a mediocre D-man and I'll quote you his terrible numbers. He's got potential but so far nothing has panned out. He's 25 and you guys are still talking about his potential as his best attribute -- LOL. Come on, Kings fans, it's like you're too dumb to realize you won this trade big time.

    Yahoo! Sports Authors