YOUR FRIENDS' ACTIVITY

    Discover Yahoo! With Your Friends

    Explore news, videos, and much more based on what your friends are reading and watching. Publish your own activity and retain full control.

    To get started, first
    Puck Daddy

    Alex Ovechkin, Zbynek Michalek both face the Shanahammer on Monday for dangerous hits

    This has to be a first for the NHL Department of Player Safety: Washington Capitals star Alex Ovechkin will have a Monday afternoon hearing for his leaping hit on Pittsburgh Penguins defenseman Zbynek Michalek ... which will take place after a Monday morning hearing for Zbynek Michalek's head-shot on the Capitals' Matt Hendricks.

    We covered the non-penalized Ovechkin hit on Sunday, and you can see that video here. As for Michalek's hit, which earned an elbowing minor, here it 'tis:

    From the NHL:

    Ovechkin, who scored in the loss, is being asked to discuss his hit on Michalek at 4:05 into the second period. The Caps' forward appeared to have left his feet and made contact with Michalek's head as he hit the Pens' defenseman in the corner behind Pittsburgh's net.

    Less than five minutes after Ovechkin's hit, Michalek -- who played more than 21 minutes Sunday -- received a minor elbowing penalty after making contact with Washington's Matt Hendricks behind the Penguins' net. Hendricks was able to get up and continue playing.

    On that second hit, Hendricks gets low to play the puck, but Michalek still has to be more responsible in that spot. After the game, he felt Ovechkin deserved a penalty for targeting the head, but acknowledged his own transgression.

    Via Brian Metzer on From The Point:

    "Yeah, it's not the first time he hit me or hit somebody else like that and I guess some players are more protected than the others," said Michalek. "It should be an even field, next shift I took a penalty and it was a good call. I elbowed the guy and I just told the ref if he makes the call on me he should have made the call on him too. It's even worse play tonight and he didn't call. It should be even no matter who makes the hit."

    Stephen Whyno of the Washington Times wonders if there are mitigating circumstances for the Ovechkin hit:

    Replays showed that Ovechkin left his feet to deliver the hit, which made contact with Michalek's head, even though it was not the principal point of contact. The Pittsburgh Penguins defenseman also appeared to be slipping before the hit, and so Ovechkin did not look to be targeting Michalek's head.

    So a player might be suspended in the morning, and then play the role of victim in another player's suspension in the afternoon. There's a screwball comedy script here begging to be written.

    Meanwhile, why couldn't Matt Hendricks hit Ovechkin over the head with his stick just to complete this Circle of Shanabans?

     

    45 comments

    • Yon  •  4 months ago
      If Ovie doesn't get suspended then the NHL and their supposed enforcement is a complete joke. How many times does he have to leave his skates when hitting someone to finally get punished?

      And there is no "appeared to have left his feet". He either did or didn't and unless your name is Helen Keller it's obvious his skates left the ice. No gray area here.
      • Canuck fan first, Hockey ... 4 months ago
        I agree, a couple games are in order for leaping into a head shot!
      • hatfield223 4 months ago
        Regardless of whether he left his feet, the primary contact was with the shoulder.
      • A Yahoo! User 4 months ago
        I, for one, am tired of seeing Ovechkin taking runs at opposing players. Players like him are the reason most teams need to employ an enforcer. It surprises me he has not had his nose punched to the side of his ugly face.
    • stephen  •  Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania  •  4 months ago
      Its funny i remember everyone on here saying what happen to Crosby was because of Cooke's style of play. All I can say is Z#$%$ was caused by Ovie's reckless play? Z was totally after someone when Ovie#$%$ didnt get called.
    • S  •  4 months ago
      I see the Michalek hit as an obvious penalty but not a suspension. At least not with the way they have been suspending players this year. They say they have zero tolerance, but that's not really the case. I think it is pretty clear the Michalek hit wasn't really intentional. He is bracing himself as he is going in for a hit and Hendricks is really low. Really, really low. He should still be penalized, as he was. But suspended? I don't know.
      • S 4 months ago
        And I didn't see the Ovechkin hit, so I don't know there.
      • Chris L 4 months ago
        Even if he didn't hit him in the neck, it would have been boarding. Michalek shouldn't have even been trying to make contact there. Couple that with the fact that it was elbow to the neck, pinning Hendricks' neck against the boards (albeit not intentionally), Michalek should be sitting in the press box. Because he's never been hit with a fine or suspension before, I'd only give him one game, but wouldn't be surprised if he got two.
      • S 3 months ago
        Chris L, your arguments aren't valid. People are guilty of boarding and elbowing all the time. They are penalties. That doesn't mean they are suspend-able. But you missed my point, probably because I didn't make it clearly. If they don't want hits like this in the game, they have to call it every time. They have to fine and suspend every player that does it. That isn't happening now, so why punish one guy for something deemed acceptable. Hits like this happen in almost every game. I'm willing to bet if Michalek hadn't just been hit by a leaping Ovechkin, we wouldn't be talking about this. So this particular hit by Michalek is an obvious penalty, but not a suspension. Yes, he is given the benefit of the doubt because he has no history of hits like this. And that is fine. They have to get rid of all hits from behind if that's what it takes. But right now they aren't legislating this out of the game.
    • hugo stiglitz  •  Los Angeles, California  •  3 months ago
      hey, ovi has to make up for his lack of production this season SOME kind of way. these two to five game suspensions by shanahan are outrageous! so what if guys like crosby, malkin, st.louis, staal, weber, van riemsdyk, giroux, miller, pronger, richards, letang, briere, or toews are sidelined for a week, month, or even a season here and there? most of those guys play that boring "skill" brand of hockey anyway. seriously, just how much can guys like that really affect who wins the cup...? i say let the players whose names we'll forget next week keep doing what keeps them employed. their hits are fun to watch, and a little concussion now and then never hurt no one. quit being wusses and just suck it up like jeremy roenick, who suffered numerous concussions and still played for 18 years! ok, so he admits his regular pauses during broadcasts are due to chronic memory loss... whatever! ;)
    • Walter  •  Cleveland, North Carolina  •  3 months ago
      I don't understand the negative comments on Zetterberg. I watched that incident from several angles on the replays and Zetterberg was hardly touching him, actually doing everything he could to avoid hitting him in a vulnerable position. Zetterberg is most certainly not a dirty player.
    • Walter  •  Cleveland, North Carolina  •  3 months ago
      How much respect do these guys have for their fellow players when they leave their feet to smash another guy's head into the glass? Hockey isn't golf, but it isn't assault with intent to injure either. Both OV and Michalek deserve the suspensions.
    • Sammy  •  Baltimore, Maryland  •  4 months ago
      The issue here. Ovie has a history and his suspension has to be longer than his last one. I believe he got 3 games for his slew foot suspension and should get 5 or 6 for this repeat offense. This is very similar to the hit Engeland had a while back for the Pens. He left his feet for a high hit and was suspended for 3 games. Ovie is a repeat offender and should get 5 - 6 games.
      • MacLeod 4 months ago
        When was Ovechkin suspended for a slew foot?
      • josie goggin 4 months ago
        he won't get penalized as a repeat offender since its been over 18 months since his last penalization.
      • Ken A 4 months ago
        I don't think lengrh of time from last suspension means anything to Mr. Shanahan. During one of his videos he refered to the players suspension 5 years ago. And I think that 3 years is the official mark for not being considered a repeat offender, so Ovechkin's is still on the books.
    • A Yahoo! User  •  4 months ago
      Ovechkin has been suspended before and he continues to do things that are could hurt other players outside the context of clean hockey. Multiple knee to knee hits, spearing Chris Neal, repeatedly charging other players, and the Brian Campbell hit just to name a few. He's reckless in a league that is focusing heavily on the health of it's players. He should be suspended this time. Two to three games is probably about right.

      We have people foaming at the mouth when Matt Cooke keeps repeating poor hockey play, but Ovechkin seems to get a low key pass on his behavior. Dangerous hockey is dangerous hockey. It's time to stop it.
    • shark47atyahoo.com  •  Manchester, New Hampshire  •  3 months ago
      seen lot worse hits before remember Chara Boston bruins defense men against Montreal that my friends was intent to hurt.seen the video Manny times people disagree must be a bruin fan. amen.
    • psmoker43  •  4 months ago
      If Hendricks can stay on his skates, that forearm goes to his back and not his head. I'm not saying he intentionally fell down to take a hit to the head, but there's got to come a point where the NHL recognizes that players who are turning their back to the play and putting themselves in vulnerable positions on purpose when there's an oncoming check are basically setting up a full-speed forechecker to take a penalty, depending on the acting abilities of the victim.
      • Steve 3 months ago
        Yea, smoke some more - should have learned as a mite - if you see #'s NO CONTACT especially along the boards. These hits should be removed from the game!!!!
    • pipes  •  4 months ago
      On 24/7 a ref told ovi he left his feet. Didn't penalize him, just informed him. That's why he does it so often, with little to no consiquence.
    • Stick Boy  •  4 months ago
      How does Zetterberg get a 5 min misconduct when the player loses and edge and falls, and yet Michalek gets a 2 min boarding call for running his elbow into another players neck?? The speed of the game is too fast for the refs.
      As for Ovie, IMO his hit was not as bad, but he did leave his feet?
      I say throw'em all out, starting with the refs.
      • stephen 4 months ago
        The officiating is so inconsistent. They should start with the officials if they want to change the league and the way the game is played.
      • Ken A 4 months ago
        Why leave your feet unless your trying to hit a guy high. How people can wach the same video and see differant things still amazes me. But I clearly saw principle contact to the head. The NHL network commentators were even saying that principle contact was to the head. Leaving his feet isn't going to help Ovechkin's defense. Reckless player. Always has been. As a repeat offender Ovechkin should see at least 8 games. Same as Carcillo. Probably gets 5 because of who he is.I have no respect for Shanahan's office.
      • Dutch 4 months ago
        You're opinion is so ridiculously biased it is laughable. You're a Red Whines, Crapitals and half a dozen other teams fan and you hate the Penguins. Hence your "opinion". Your opinion stinks as bad as you do, steamy goat #$%$
    • Sean N  •  4 months ago
      Stephen Whyno is living up to his name. He lists Michalek as "appearing to be slipping" as a mitigating factor? Chug some more rose stephen, it's already colored your glasses.
    • Mr. Harry Nuckles  •  4 months ago
      This article is completely incorrect. The neanderthal is no longer a star, he is a semi-star. The league continues to promote him as a star, but that will change as his game is no longer even close to that of Crosby's & Malkin 's. He is the new Kovalchuk.

      Give him a 15 game suspension to make up for all of the cheap shots he has gotten away with in the past as well.
    • The Friar  •  St Louis, Missouri  •  4 months ago
      Dear everyone: "principal" is not another word for "initial". Ovechkin hitting Michalek's shoulder first need not at all mean that Ovi didn't mainly hit Zbynek in the head. kthxbye
    • stephen  •  Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania  •  4 months ago
      Does anyone think Z#$%$ was a result of the no call against Ovie? I watched the game an he seemed like he did it to prove a point. If Ovie can hit and continue to play reckless with no consequences why cant everyone else. Until the league begins to punish all individuals equal this will continue.
    • i8urtoe  •  Dallas, Texas  •  4 months ago
      I am confused here. I see this play a lot with the only difference being that Hendricks is hunched over really low. Does he not have some responsibility for putting himself in that vulnerable of a position? If he was standing up more normally, that arm goes into his back and not his neck. Penalty, yea, suspension, no way.
    • Slappyshott  •  4 months ago
      Go to Youtube and watch any of Ovechkin's "Greatest Hits" videos. He consistently leaves his feet, and targets players who are fighting off a check or being screened from the oncoming hit. He has been throwing high hits off his skates and knee-to-knee hits since he came into the league. He doesn't fight (once?), and has been suspended and fined for this stuff before.

      Michalek will probably get supplemental discipline, I suppose Ovechkin will, too. But Michalek's only mistake is that he didn't target Ovechkin.
    • Weescot  •  Woburn, Massachusetts  •  3 months ago
      OK good. You're back on track, talking about hockey
    • bononista  •  4 months ago
      For Ovi at this point leaving his feet is a bad habit, nothing more. If you watch the HBO coverage of the lead up to the Winter Classic with the Pens, you can actively witness an official reminding him to NOT leave his feet - at which point he is 'aware' and can be seen making the effort to not do so. Ovechkin has needed a Senior mentor for 6 years. No one NHL alum has stepped forward to work on his form, fixing his bad habits, bringing down his weight and working on his aerobic strength. The fault is clearly with the officials -- if reminding him to NOT leave his feet isn't working, then you have to call the penalty. I blame his coaches, the officials, and the lack of a true leader for him and the other Capitals players. Crosby was polished and preened and primed for perfection -- Ovechkin was left to natural ability to fend for himself without a mentor. He's 25 years old. Give him a personal trainer and a mentor and you will probably never see him leave his feet in a hit again.

    Yahoo! Sports Authors