YOUR FRIENDS' ACTIVITY

    Discover Yahoo! With Your Friends

    Explore news, videos, and much more based on what your friends are reading and watching. Publish your own activity and retain full control.

    To get started, first
    Shutdown Corner

    If you’re willing to donate to charity, you can be above the law in Indianapolis this weekend

    Getty ImagesWhen I went to Phoenix for Super Bowl XLII, I was terrified of breaking the law because the sheriff there was a crazy person. This year in Indianapolis, out-of-towners are getting a little bit more of an olive branch.

    For minor offenses, a $100 donation to the Clothe-a-Child fund can get you completely off the hook. You do the (minor, likely victimless) crime, you do no time, and kids in need benefit. Sounds like a win-win to me.

    If you're curious about what you can get away with, Deputy Prosecutor Allison Broviak told the Indy Star that minor offenses include things like public intoxication, trespassing, or selling counterfeit tickets. So maybe you can be a little more at ease when throwing back an extra shot or five, but it's not like you have a golden pass to distribute snuff films or set a police car on fire or something.

    I would like to see selling counterfeit tickets removed from the list. That's not a victimless crime. That's a premeditated criminal act that preys on people desperate to see their favorite team play in the Super Bowl. If you do that, you deserve to see the inside of a jail cell.

    That's my only quibble. But not everyone likes the policy.

    Ken Falk, legal director of the ACLU, told the Indy Star that he questions the fairness of the policy for those who aren't so well-off.

    "Someone who is poor is burdened because of his poverty," said Falk. "There is a disparity of what is available to them because of their inability to pay."

    A fair point. However, we are talking about out-of-towners on Super Bowl weekend, and I'm guessing very few of those are destitute. And everyone still has all the standard legal options ‒ community service, a guilty plea, a not guilty plea ‒ but I'd guess that most people will happily donate $100 to a good cause and go home.

    I like it. Way to think outside the box, Indy.

    Watch Full Count!
     
    • HMarks  •  New York, New York  •  3 months ago
      The article should read... CALLING ALL COUNTERFEITERS!!!

      So stupid to release any of this information..

      But it seems like more of a justification to bang drinkers(everyone) for 100bucks.
    • wishbone  •  Tucker, Georgia  •  3 months ago
      So....I could sell a pair of counterfeit tickets and make $3000-$3500 but only pay a fine of $100? Sweet! I don't think this part of the "amnesty" is too smart...
      • Storm Shadow 3 months ago
        I agree. "Selling counterfeit tickets" shouldn't be included.
      • iversam 3 months ago
        I'm pretty sure that's a Federal offense...good luck with that...
      • A Yahoo! User 3 months ago
        The writer of the article messed up on that one.. Or whoever told the writer of the article..
    • Chris  •  3 months ago
      There's going to be a lot of public urination in Indy this weekend. Ew.
      • Bubba Zanetti 3 months ago
        So how's that different from any other weekend?
      • PoopsyMcDuff 3 months ago
        But how else can you mark your territory? Feces?
      • Angie 3 months ago
        So then there will be a lot of children benefiting as well. I like this idea!
    • T-Money  •  Terre Haute, Indiana  •  3 months ago
      Don't know if it's been notice yet from the comments, but from the word for word text of the article, the ACLU missed a key word in their defense.

      "For minor offenses, a $100 donation to the Clothe-a-Child fund can get you completely off the hook."

      The word is 'can,' those that can afford to pay can pay. But those that can't must do the time or whatever the normal fine/correction is supposed to be.

      Out of towners aren't going to be doing community service in Indy or whatever while their here. Poor people like myself, who aren't from out of state or whatever, must pay a little more attention to the laws because we're poor and can't afford such luxuries.

      To each their own burdens. No big deal.
      • ChrisS 3 months ago
        The poor can always opt to obey the law or get a job.
      • Dave 3 months ago
        Did you ever notice how many poor people waiting in a social services office are overweight? Or stepping just outside to smoke(at $6.60/pack)? The poor live in poverty due to their own choices and behavior and drag the rest of us down.
      • Greg McClain 3 months ago
        Dave your a butthead!!!!!!!! Being overweight has nothing to be with being poor,( Yes I catch that stupid reference that there well fed) Now the smoke issus is a little different. Your right if you have to acquire food stamps to eat then why are you spending funds on smokes
    • jfhaha  •  3 months ago
      Officer: Ok you have a choice, give me $100 or go to jail
      Public : Sorry do I get a reciept
      Officer Receipt for what?
      Next week
      Officer: sorry but you under arrest
      Public: sorry, heres a $100
      Officer: Oh so you wanna try and bribe me huh
      Judge: trying to bribe an official is a serious offense
      Public: judge would you take $200.
      Judge : case dimissed.
      • reality bites 3 months ago
        that only works in the middle east and mexico
    • Henry  •  West Palm Beach, Florida  •  3 months ago
      Why should I have to pay $100 for being publicly intoxicated? I do it for free all the time.
      • JackWagon 3 months ago
        At least you don't have a Bentley.
      • Henry 3 months ago
        No, I walk so I don't get a DUI. I don't cause trouble, I just like to drink plenty of beer.
      • JackWagon 3 months ago
        Yep. Walking is better. Probably cheaper if you just drink at home.
    • Matt  •  Dallas, Texas  •  3 months ago
      Rich people do this all the time. This is just the middle-America version.
    • Dave F  •  Cleveland, Ohio  •  3 months ago
      So, how much fine (if any) will the prostitutes pay?
    • Brian  •  Poway, California  •  3 months ago
      Anyone ever bought a beer at a football game? It'll cost more than a hundred bucks to GET intoxicated.
    • Soy_el_Guapo  •  3 months ago
      I am going to go all NASCAR on Washington BLVD!
    • john  •  3 months ago
      I live in allen county Indiana,,The city of Fort Wayne. The city has a 'downtown improvement district' that throws block parties to raise money (so far only to pay their salries) and we have a "3 rivers festival every summer,,,we lead the state in D.W.I arrests yup even more than Indy a city more than 6 times our size. The powers that be actually anounced last year due to flagging attendence that cops would NOT be writing DWI-OWI tickets in the downtown area during the city sponcered events. Funny how the public safty issue flies out the window when they are making a buck off of me! Needless to say i don't attend any city sponcered events any more.
    • scott  •  3 months ago
      I wonder how many people are making counterfeit tickets after hearing they will only have to pay $100 for that crime.
    • Eddie  •  3 months ago
      This may have been a great idea, had it not been publicized. Now you're just inviting people to act like idiots, knowing they probably won't be prosecuted. Morons!
    • G-MenFan11  •  Atlanta, Georgia  •  3 months ago
      Cool, so sell counterfeit tickets for 500 bucks each, get caught, pay $100, come out a big winner. Brilliant
    • Dubya  •  3 months ago
      Why doesn't the ACLU just shut the hell up
    • Brandon  •  Norman, Oklahoma  •  3 months ago
      WOW didnt know the super bowl was being played in Mexico.....
    • Jeffers  •  Norwich, Connecticut  •  3 months ago
      Might as well go ahead and announce that people can misbehave, instead of giving them a pat on the @$$ afterwards. Good luck Indy!
    • SarcasmMan  •  Cleveland, Ohio  •  3 months ago
      Did the ACLU EVER see a whine they couldn't pass up?
    • 55_out  •  Torrance, California  •  3 months ago
      Ken Falk, legal director of the ACLU, told the Indy Star that he questions the fairness of the policy for those who aren't so well-off."Someone who is poor is burdened because of his poverty," said Falk. "There is a disparity of what is available to them because of their inability to pay."Really ??? If you can't afford the cime don't do it. No one should be drinking and getting publicly intoxicated, especially the poor, food stamps and welfare are to support yourself and family with essentials to survive, not to party at the SB. DUUUHHH. Plus the donations must go to help the needy. If I were on public assistance I would happy to know that money was coming in to help clothe my child, not #$%$ because I can't afford to donate $100 to get out of serving jail time for getting drunk in a bar.This is essentially a tax on those who can afford it that goes directly to helping the needy---what's the prob w/that ? It also saves the tax payers the court costs and cost of incaration.
    • Critic at Large  •  3 months ago
      freaking ACLU of course they have to put their two cents in. They want equal right under the law to break the law for poor folks. What they really want is the rich out-of-towners to have to pay a local lawyer to get them off their petty offense and be able to go home.

    Meet The Shutdown Corner Team