YOUR FRIENDS' ACTIVITY

    Discover Yahoo! With Your Friends

    Explore news, videos, and much more based on what your friends are reading and watching. Publish your own activity and retain full control.

    To get started, first
    Shutdown Corner

    Officiating gaffe costs Lions crucial touchdown

    (Kevin Cox/Getty)

    A major officiating gaffe in the second quarter of Saturday night's NFC wild card game cost the Detroit Lions a potential touchdown that would have given the team a 14-point lead over the New Orleans Saints.

    The play featured a bizarre combination of shoddy in-play officiating and confusing post-play interpretations that left viewers and television analysts baffled.

    Drew Brees dropped back to pass on a second down from Detroit's 36-yard line and was hit by Willie Young of the Lions. The ball fluttered in the air, landing near a pile of Detroit defenders. A whistle blew the play dead while the ball was still free, an instant before a Lions defender picked up the ball with a clear path to the end zone.

    [ Related: Brees, Saints shred Lions in wild-card showdown ]

    The pass was ruled incomplete and the Saints hurried to the line, trying to get a play off before officials could change their mind. After a brief zebra conference, it was determined that the ball had been dislodged from Brees' hand before he threw, thus making it a live ball. Since Detroit clearly recovered the fumble, the Lions were awarded the ball on their own 35-yard line.

    The turnover was big for the Lions but could have been bigger. Had the whistle never blown, Detroit would have picked up the fumble and returned it for a touchdown and a 21-7 lead. Instead, the Lions went three-and-out on the subsequent possession. That early whistle cost the Lions seven points.

    But we're not done with the story of the whistle quite yet. As NBC came out of its halftime break, Al Michaels and Cris Collinsworth explained that because the whistle blew before the Lions recovered the fumble, the play should have been dead. By this interpretation, New Orleans should have had the ball. They insisted that the play was not reviewable because audio is not a part of replay challenges.

    [ Related: Brett Favre shows up at Superdome ]

    That's not the case. The whistle only stopped the Lions fumble return, not the recovery. The so-called Hochuli Rule, instituted in 2009 after an inadvertent whistle in a San Diego Chargers game, ensures that the play continues even after a whistle is blown.

    Jim Schwartz wasn't pleased with the call after the game. He spoke about the early whistle with reporters:

    "[It] would have been nice to have capitalized on was the sack-forced fumble that should have been a touchdown, because every other time in this league they've let that play go and they don't blow the whistle. We were a victim of that last week, with them continuing plays, and for some reason in this game they decided to blow the whistle when that would have been seven points in this. [...] Those kind of missed opportunities are more where this game went."

    Had officials stayed out of the way and kept the whistles quiet, Detroit would have had a touchdown and a 14-point lead. New Orleans' offense was so explosive that it probably wouldn't have mattered. It's too bad that in their first playoff game since 2000, the Detroit Lions didn't get a chance to find out.

    Other popular content on Yahoo! Sports:
    The Jerry Jones Bowl? What if the NFL embraced the BCS format?
    Everyone back to chasing Wildcats in SEC hoops
    USA Soccer must steer clear of destructive Jermaine Jones

    Watch Full Count!
     
    • HADLEY  •  Toledo, Ohio  •  4 months ago
      Plays like this need to run their course.
      They can always be reviewed when the play is over.
      Ref's screwed up again.
    • dunno  •  Ellwood City, Pennsylvania  •  4 months ago
      The officials in the NFL . . . . SUCK!!!
      • Robert 4 months ago
        II wouldn't say the officiating sucks. The officials appear to have an agenda and certain teams seem to be under a different standard of officiating.
      • Jerry 4 months ago
        They are not allowed to gamble but says their relatives can't
      • Jerry 4 months ago
        who says?
    • Rick  •  Phoenix, Arizona  •  4 months ago
      Anybody remember a playoff game between San Diego and Denver a few years ago. Denver fumbled at the Chargers 10 yd line and the Chargers recovered it. The head official said that he had blown the whistle in error but would not award the ball to San Diego. Denver scored a touchdown on the next play. Chargers lose, Denver wins and goes on in the playoffs. Sure they changed the rules after that but it is still lacking. Mistakes will be made but when players bust their tails to win a game and then it is decided in part by an official making an error, it has to hurt everyone.
      • Rippers 4 months ago
        yep
      • Jared 4 months ago
        Nice..... Sounds Saintly
      • Ted 4 months ago
        Ya expect it was week 2 and not the playoffs, Denver did not make the playoffs that year and San Diego did.
    • TomM  •  Maringouin, Louisiana  •  4 months ago
      A botched call yes but no defense in the second half is what cost them the game
      • Tim 4 months ago
        well yea but the touchdown would have increased moral and momentum
      • Boowhooo 4 months ago
        tim, that is the coulda/woulda/shoulda thinking... holding onto a botched call = why TomM is correct.
      • Dr. Dolamite 4 months ago
        There were more than just that one. It's just that this one stood out the most.
    • wheaux dat  •  4 months ago
      Saints fan here - Agree it was a bad cal. Detroit would have recovered anyway even if a whistle didn't blow. BUT - you can clearly see a bunch of Saints players standing around doing nothing after the fumble. If there were no whistle, its entirely possible that they would have hustled to toward the ball and been able to get to the one who recovered and tackle him after a 5 - 10 yd return. Maybe not - but you can't say that this would have been a clear TD for Lions.
      Moral of story - since the refs are NOT supposed to blow whistle on a "close" play like this until all the dust has settled, it did suck for the Lions. The refs need to correct this if they are to continue to use replay. Either don't blow the whistle and let replay sort it out later, or just go with the calls on the field, like the "good old days."
      • Martin 4 months ago
        True. 7 points would have been a momentum changer, but not a game decider.
        If both teams had a good defense, it would have been an issue. Neither one did. Not to mention the game ended with the Ain'ts first-and-goal on the 1....
      • Tony 4 months ago
        WD - I completely agree with your 2nd paragraph.
        After the Lions defender picked the ball up, he ran 10 yds. with an escort or two b4 stopping. It very likely would have been a td (depending on how fast said defender was. If I remember right, it was a linebacker.)
      • Ainttherenomo 4 months ago
        The whistle stopped play, period! Saints defenders were standing around because the whistle told them the play was dead! Otherwise, its entirely likely they would've shown the same hustle they displayed all game and would have recovered the fumble themselves, or caused another one by one of their signature hits on the Lion that recovered. This crap about special rules for playoffs is rediculous, once a whistle is blown they have always said to my knowledge that play is over at that point, no review! Therefore the ball should have remained with the Saints , I've seen it happen the opposite way against the Saints numerous times. Regardless, no whining by Saints staff, only Lions? We still stopped them and no points. Last time I checked, Saints won by 17, so non-issue, except I guess it could've been 24 if called correctly, no make that 31 if Saints, unlike most teams, didn't once again take a knee for over 2 minutes on the 1 to show the class act they are. Would've been nice to see Schwartz display the same class in his post game hand shake and interview...not a chance!
    • infinite truth  •  Denver, Colorado  •  4 months ago
      Lions had a TD taken away from them last week, this week,plus the Saints spot was no first down,on a drive they eventually scored on. I'd be livid...except I'm a Packers fan. NFL officials are starting to remind me of congressmen.
      • Elle 4 months ago
        did you watch the replay? the ball crossed the line before being pushed back, forward progress.
      • kellie 4 months ago
        lol i still love those #$%$ lions
      • John 4 months ago
        elle you have the wrong play in mind
    • Beast  •  Tampa, Florida  •  4 months ago
      Not a lions fan but this crap happens to you guys way too much. The NFL hates you and I have no idea why. Great looking team, good luck next year.
    • Moose  •  Midland, Texas  •  4 months ago
      Very good article Chris, and I agree about the Saints being so explosive it may not have mattered. But a blown call is a blown call and this has to be a bad one.
    • John  •  4 months ago
      you know, It is so sad that the ref's are still the weakest link in the NFL. All year long, in just about ever game, there is at least one bad call. These over payed , under educated ref's need to be fined when they make a bad call, just like the payers when they do something wrong.....
    • BB  •  Tampa, Florida  •  4 months ago
      My hat goes off to Sproles,a class act. No stupid hot dogging after touchdown. I am so sick of the ridiculous dancing ect. after a good play. Learn something from Sproles be recpectful, atleast for the younger generation watching. Yes the officals had a few bad calls, give the Lions 14 points and they still loose the game.They are a good team and I'm sure they will be in there again next year. Very impressive win Saints.
    • Rippers  •  Atlanta, Georgia  •  4 months ago
      Saints with three penalties for 18 yards. Two were block in the back I believe on punts, other was a false start. Not a single hold or pas interference . That is almost unheard of in today's football.
    • g  •  St Louis, Missouri  •  4 months ago
      The NFL has the worst officiating of any sport.
    • chriss  •  Allen Park, Michigan  •  4 months ago
      It was a great year and even though the ref's did cost the lions 7 points I'm not sure the lions would have won either way and the lions didn't play like they deserved to win in that 2nd half. The ref play was terrible like the spotting the ball on that 3rd down pass from drew breeze that the announcers all said should have been 4th and 1 on there own 27 but was given first and 10 on there 28. Plays like this hurt the lions but I think the better team won this game. And as a lions fan im hopeful for next year. We need a good CB maybe a safety and another good LB on defense. And we need to start building stafford a better line on offence to get us a running game and maybe even take a shot at one of these Mega star RB's that will be a free agent. Ray Rice or Matt Forte or even peyton hillis would fit the lions sceme well. and bring us a more durable RB for the future.
    • TheAztecNation  •  San Diego, California  •  4 months ago
      Worst story ever!! Did you watch the game... Did you see the Saints punter? Not once. No there guy the refs didnt cost the Lions. It was there defense that folded like a lawn chair for 4 qrts that cost them...
    • E Z  •  4 months ago
      The NFL needs PROFESSIONAL refs. after watching both games today,I can't watch anymore.
    • robert  •  Cleveland, Ohio  •  4 months ago
      Ive said it before Ill say it again, officials should not have the power to chane the outcome of a game
    • Blorto  •  4 months ago
      It is all about momentum, who knows what the adrenaline could have done for Detroit. too bad really.
    • jamie m  •  Montgomery, Alabama  •  4 months ago
      Why is it that the NFL ( the most successful sports league in the U.S.) doesn't have full time refs. With the amount of money the league generates and the amount it pays the players and coaches, there's no reason that the refs should be part-time help. I am a life time football fan that is losing interest in the NFL...
    • patti  •  4 months ago
      What's funny is in one breath yall say let them play and then in the other yall are man they didnt call this and that. Make up your minds! The Saints have gotten the short end of the stick for many many many years not that I condone anyone being favored over the other, but the fact is even if you take the touchdown away where you say he didnt have the first down and the foward progress of Brees than you have to take away the touchdown of Stafford cause his knee was down. So after all the calculations are in the score would be 31-21 the lions still lose so there you have it. The Saints won and the lions go home just as the Saints did last year at this time...that is where the saying "you win some you lose some" comes from....WHO DAT!
    • M  •  4 months ago
      I saw the play and was confused... the whistle ends the play. This "hochuli rule" crap is just that - if the whistle blows, inadvertently or not, all the players stop playing. They don't hit, block, chase, tackle - the play is dead. So for the Lions to have "recovered" it is crap, and saying they would've scored a touchdown is too, as there were Saints all over near him and the endzone.