If NFL teams follow through on a plan to check prospects' tattoos, "meat market" might not be a strong enough term.
Spoke w longtime NFL personnel man who said in wake of AaronHernandez teams may use police experts to check prospects tattoos
— Bruce Feldman (@BFeldmanCBS) July 23, 2013
Before this idea comes to pass, you'd think someone would object to it.
Tattoos are obviously very popular (can you imagine 300 prospects at the combine waiting in line to get their tattoos checked?) and certainly not a sign of any wrongdoing or an implication of anyone's character. Making a player wait while a police expert checks tattoos all over his body ranks somewhere between "kind of creepy" and "complete invasion of privacy." Maybe the NFL players' union would have a problem with this. If the ACLU has a problem with businesses asking for Facebook passwords during job interviews, it would stand to reason it wouldn't be so keen on a future NFL employer examining your chest for the meaning of that tribal tattoo.
Given the NFL's long history of ignoring every type of character issue to try and land the next great player in the draft, checking tattoos is probably just wasting everyone's time anyway.
Related coverage on Yahoo! Sports:
• Bill Belichick best served if he addresses Aaron Hernandez case
• Redskins legends say team should seriously consider name change
• RG3 inspires Marcus Lattimore's 'miracle'
- American Football
- Sports & Recreation