YOUR FRIENDS' ACTIVITY

    Discover Yahoo! With Your Friends

    Explore news, videos, and much more based on what your friends are reading and watching. Publish your own activity and retain full control.

    To get started, first
    Dr. Saturday

    New ‘oversigning’ rules force Nick Saban to tip his hand (Updated)

    buffett.jpgPlease see update at the bottom of the post — ed.

    Last summer, the SEC adopted new "roster management" rules designed to address the scourge of "oversigning," foremost among them a 25-man cap on new additions in any given year. Finally, no more stockpiling of academic casualties bound for junior college. No more new arrivals signing letters of intent that lock them into a specific school, only to discover six months later that there's no room for them, after all. No more promises to teenagers being broken at the last minute. Right?

    Not so fast my friend:

    One of Georgia's top running backs said that was told by Alabama's Nick Saban this weekend that he will have to wait until next year to sign with the Crimson Tide.

    Justin Taylor of North Atlanta High School has been committed to Alabama for nearly a year, last February becoming the No. 7 pledge for this year's class. The 5-foot-11, 208-pounder missed his senior season with a knee injury.

    A couple of weeks ago, Taylor and his high school coach, former NFL RB Stanley Pritchett, both said they were informed by Alabama assistant Chris Rumph that it was likely that Taylor would not be able to sign with the Crimson Tide this February.
    […]
    "Coach Saban just said I'm the 26th commitment. I would be the 26th signee. I guess he went and picked up somebody else. He said I make 26 and they only get 25."

    Based on verbal commitments, Alabama's 2012 recruiting class is currently ranked No. 1 in the nation (again) according to Rivals, and Taylor is a relatively lowly three-star prospect at a position that also includes commitments from five-star headliner T.J. Yeldon and four-star Kenyan Drake. Saban confirmed this weekend that Taylor's longstanding offer — again, he verbally committed last February, and spent the subsequent 11 months set on going to Alabama — had effectively been yanked with just weeks to go before the vast majority of recruits sign binding letters of intent on Feb. 1. In place of a scholarship, Saban offered a sort of non-binding contract instead: As Taylor explains it, "…he also said he would sign a piece of paper to show that they are keeping their word — they are going to sign it and they want me to sign it to make sure I know I still have my scholarship."

    buffett.jpgTaylor says he plans to stick with Alabama, at least in part because other schools backed off due to a) His commitment to the Tide, and b) A torn ACL he suffered in August that cost him virtually his entire senior season. (Not to discount the fact that he actually wants to go to Alabama: Taylor was on campus for an official visit this weekend, ate breakfast at Saban's house and generally thought the trip "went great.") Instead, he said he plans to remain in Georgia, continue physical therapy on his knee, go to work — he told the AJC "they are going to find me a job," instantly setting off conspiratorial alarm bells across the South — and enroll next January with the early arrivals in the class of 2013.

    In other words, he's a grayshirt without the letter of intent. And in this case, he seems to be cool with that.

    If I was in his position, I would not be so cool with that, but whatever. Here's the relevant question: Is this an example of the success of the new signing restrictions, or of their ultimate irrelevance? On one hand, Taylor was promised a scholarship, remained committed to Alabama for nearly a year, did not flirt with other schools in the meantime and suddenly finds himself up against a wall in terms of pursuing other options because Alabama reneged on its offer — more or less the same scenario that's driven criticism of oversigning for years. On the other hand, at least he still has other options: Under the old rules, he likely would have signed an LOI next month and spent another six months in the fold before getting the axe in late July when a spot failed to open up for him. It may be a raw deal, but at least it's one coaches now have to make earlier in the process, and one that a recruit can agree to — or reject, or subsequently walk away from — before he puts his signature on anything.

    As long as verbal commitments are unofficial, unregulated and non-binding, they'll come coated in a certain amount of slime. But it is significantly less slimy than pulling the rug out from under a recruit who has already locked himself into a one-way commitment. Justin Taylor can still change his mind without the express written consent of the University of Alabama. As long as he plans to hold up his end of the bargain, though, I have one word of advice: When it's your turn to sign that "piece of paper" Coach Saban was talking about, you'll probably want to have it notarized.

    UPDATE, 3:49 p.m. ET After some consideration, Taylor has decided that no, in fact, he's really not cool with this:

    "At first I was cool with it but the more I thought about it, the less I liked it," Taylor said. "I have already missed an entire season of football because of my injury. I decided I just can't miss another season. It's no hard feelings against Alabama but I just decided it's best for me if I go somewhere that I can be at least practicing with the team this year, even if I have to redshirt. I haven't talked to any other schools yet but I will start looking right now."

    Plus, do you know how hard it is to find a decent attorney in Atlanta who specializes in cocktail napkins?

    - - -
    Hat tip: Blutarsky.
    Matt Hinton is on Facebook and Twitter: Follow him @DrSaturday.

    Watch Full Count!
     

    17 comments

    • Yellowhammer  •  Stone Mountain, Georgia  •  4 months ago
      2 national championships in 3 years...Saban gives the whining posters 2 middle fingers...
      • Chris 3 months ago
        He also gives 2 middle fingers to all the 18-20 yr old kids that he runs off his team. But, a kid getting an education from a well known university isn't what's important.
    • Paul  •  Marietta, Georgia  •  4 months ago
      Glad universities don't handle academic admittance this way. can't imagine planning for a year to attend a university that accepted me only to be told 2 weeks before classes begin that they are full. Winning is the goal but winning at any cost is not. Would not let my kid play for saban.
      • A 4 months ago
        Assuming you had a child talented enough to play for Alabama in the 1st place.
      • bud 4 months ago
        Your right "A", his entire point is nullified by the fact that his fictional child is unlikely to be offered a fictional scholarship from Saban anyway. Of course he did put together a coherent string of sentences so his concerns about Alabama could also be academic in nature.
    • William  •  Chicago, Illinois  •  4 months ago
      You failed to mention that schools can only have 85 active players on scholorship no matter how many they bring in. Even if these schools did just sign 25 a year they are still making the cuts going into the fall because of the 85 limit. In essence these schools are seperating the weak and cutting them. It gives them a huge advantage over a four year period. Compare them to schools that sign players to the 85 limit (not 25 a year with cuts) and they are pulling in another entire class of recruits over a four year period. No wonder there are some NC on this list....
    • mike h  •  Clancy, Montana  •  4 months ago
      Saban went 9-2 in his BEST year in the Big 10 but he wasn't allowed to sign 30 kids a year either. When everybody plays by the same rules, the SEC will be back where they belong but that could take a while.
      • closed 4 months ago
        I see any negative comments about the article are squashed and deleted. Figures.
      • Chris 4 months ago
        how exactly has he signed 30 kids a year at UA? his first year he signed 32 from there on out the most he signed was 27? Which sounds SO bad until you think that he's had AT LEAST 2 juniors go pro the last 3 years and several JUCO guys. I'll also note that the SEC has stricter oversigning rules than the Big 10. The SEC is just more competitive so there is more pressure to push the limits of what you're allowed to do. Saban should not be the poster child for this. Houston Nutt was a way worse offender but it's a lot more convenient to put it on Saban because saban actually wins.
      • Chris 4 months ago
        Also, of the 10 schools on that list, Alabama and LSU are the only 2 who are actually nationally competitive on a consistant basis... So how is that a barometer for success?
    • EricD  •  Traverse City, Michigan  •  4 months ago
      Wow...no wonder the SEC has been good recently. Look at that signees list. Win at all costs I guess
      • ConnGator 4 months ago
        Florida won two MNC without oversigning...
    • Gary J  •  Highlands Ranch, Colorado  •  4 months ago
      I can definitely tell the writer and many of the guys below were never college athletes.
      So you guys want to make a LOI and verbal commitments a binding contract. What you fail to realize is that it is a 2 way street. You are expecting a 17 to 19 year old kid make what may be one of his most important life decisions based on a few minutes meeting a coach. I'm sure glad people much smarter than you are making the rules.
      So let's look at the extreme. You severly restrict the number of signess. You make the whole process a binding contract. Then if the kid wants to leave the school, whether it's for more playing time or to be closer to family or some other reason, he's told he can not or best case he can after a year or two.
      Mrmocha is right. You don't see Big 10 schools on the list. That's because his OSU and the rest of the Big 10 schools follow the example I show above. But just wait until the next story when any of the kids from that conference wants to leave for whatever reason. So forcing a kid to stay is in the best interest of the kid? Not in my opinion.
      Yes, College football is all about winning. But even more important, college football is about money. With every position on a team linked to winning / money, the tighter controls you force on the school, the tighter the grip will be on the student athlete. 2 way street. Get it?
      EricD makes the assumption that when you let kids transfer or have many of the players turn pro just means you want to win at all costs. You can tell he played FBS somewhere, right?
      Look at this list and then check out the number of pro football players from the school. I bet you find a correlation.
      Yes, some kids get cut. Sorry to break it to you, but when you kids grow up, you will find that it's part of life. And unlike the author or the couch coaches below, the vast majority of cuts are not a result of something better has come along. If you had a conversation with the coach at your school, you would find that most college players have greatly improved in just one or two years in the system. It takes a freak newbie to be at the level of even a soph. player much less a jr. or sr.
      In my opinion, the kid in this story is lucky. A 3 star athlete gets a verbal commitment from one of the best programs in the nation then tears his ACL. You guys can cry your eyes out over him but believe me nobody is looking at him just because he signed with Bama. He's lucky that Saban is a man of integrity or his football days at a major FBS school would be over. So why doesn't OSU, Wisc. or some other Big Ten team sign him? Come on guys- show us how much your school cares for the players. Start a pettion or something.
      • Chris 3 months ago
        I hope your child (or future child) is athletically gifted enough to earn a scholarship offer from a top flight football institution just to see him forced to transfer to a junior college. You might sing a different tune then.
      • Gary J 3 months ago
        Chris, the only athletes I know that were 'forced' to transfer to JC were those that couldn't make academic grades. This never happened to me or anyone I personally knew, but I've never heard of a college having the power to force a kid to go JC. Are you sending your kids to a military school or something? I would really like to hear where you came up with your statement.
    • TW  •  Chicago, Illinois  •  4 months ago
      Not surprised to see some NCs on that list.
    • mrmocha  •  4 months ago
      I see at least once conference not on that list.
    • Chris  •  Riverview, Florida  •  4 months ago
      of the 10 schools on that list, Alabama and LSU are the only 2 who are actually nationally competitive on a consistant basis... So how is that a barometer for success?
    • Yellowhammer  •  Stone Mountain, Georgia  •  4 months ago
      Hey, if he's so committed to the Tide...walk on! Some players still do that...if not, GA State could use you.
    • Lukey  •  Chicago, Illinois  •  4 months ago
      Nice, Nick. Find a better player, throw the kid on the trash heap. Been doing this for years...what a tool.
    • Timothy  •  Charlotte, North Carolina  •  4 months ago
      And people wonder why the West Division has improved over the East. Maybe because Georgia and Florida don't treat kids like they do in the West. Oh, and lookie there, USC in the East has done the same. Parallel that with their rise in the East. Hmmmm....
    • closed  •  Doylestown, Pennsylvania  •  4 months ago
      Two MAJOR facts you conveniently ignore as well........
      1. One of the reasons other schools backed off is because of Taylor's ACL injury. Those schools don't seem too concerned about his future.
      2. Taylor wants to go to Bama. He said his official visit this weekend "went great" and he has no problem with sitting out, especially considering he'd have to sit out a year, anyway, because of the injury.
    • Dave  •  Greenville, South Carolina  •  4 months ago
      Why the best football schools are restricted to 85 scholarships? So the smaller schools with less fan support have "a level playing field." It's got nothing to do with protecting the students.

      I'm tired of seeing Texas and Alabama having to play by San Diego State rules. If a school can afford 100 scholarships, let them.

      The best organizations are always the most competitive internally. Why should college football be any different? If you want a FREE education playing football at one of the best programs in the country, you need to accept the fact that so do all the other best players. It's going to be more competitive. If that troubles you, go to Stanford, Northwestern or Duke, where a FREE education is worth much more than a degree from Alabama. And if you want to trot out the exploitation argument, then by all means forego the FREE education and go to college the way most people do - with tons of loans and a couple of part-time jobs.
    • closed  •  Doylestown, Pennsylvania  •  4 months ago
      Butthurt article to say the least. Get over it. Alabama and Saban are the best. Kids want to become men and the best they can be....play for the Tide.

      Btw...

      NCAA Bylaw 13.2.3.3 allows an institution to arrange for employment or employ any prospect, provided the employment does NOT begin prior to the completion of the prospect's senior year in high school.
    • Robert  •  4 months ago
      Ole Miss, the team at the top of this list (20 over) has a new coach after winning just 2 games, and the team at the bottom (LSU, 1 over) just played for the NC. Doesn't exactly correlate, does it?
    • Malcolm and JennK  •  Richardson, Texas  •  4 months ago
      Well, if he is grayshirted, he is still on the team and practicing. Will need to take student loans for a semester before his scholarship kicks in. And even without oversigning, players will still need to go to community college is they don't make grades. I dunno is "stockpiling" players really is relevant to oversigning. And there are ways to have an agreement legally binding if he is greyshirted.

      There are problems with college football, but I don't quite see how oversigning is really that big of a deal.