YOUR FRIENDS' ACTIVITY

    Discover Yahoo! With Your Friends

    Explore news, videos, and much more based on what your friends are reading and watching. Publish your own activity and retain full control.

    To get started, first
    Dr. Saturday

    Lane Kiffin has a plan for USC’s reduced scholarship numbers, but he’s not telling what it is

    buffett.jpg

    Originally, back when USC was hit with the most heavy-handed NCAA sanctions in 20 years in 2010, this was supposed to be the year the Trojans really felt the bite: The appeals have been exhausted, the scholarship penalties are in full effect and two years as a nonentity in the Pac-12 and BC races taken a bite out of the formidable brand forged by former coach Pete Carroll. At least, that's how it was supposed to work.

    In reality, the Trojans will begin the 2012 season as frontrunners for the conference and national championships and are on the verge of inking another impressive — albeit abbreviated — recruiting class that will likely go down as the highest-ranked haul in the Pac-12 for the tenth consecutive season, in spite of the paltry numbers. Which brings us to another question: After bringing in a full, 30-man class in 2011, just how are those numbers going to work, exactly?

    USC already has eight verbal commitments for 2012, not counting the four early enrollees who are considered part of the 2011 class. Kiffin has said he wants to sign a full class of 15 recruits.

    Here's where the math gets tricky. As it stands now, a full 15-man recruiting class would give USC roughly 80 scholarship players. USC, as part of its probation, cannot have more than 75 scholarship players.

    How will they get to that number? Kiffin isn't saying.

    "We've had a stance here on numbers going back to a year-and-a-half ago when this happened, that we don't discuss really how we're managing the situation here with numbers and stuff for competitive reasons," Kiffin said.

    buffett.jpgIt's not really as mysterious as all that. One reason the numbers are in such (relatively) good shape: If you didn't know any better, you might think the Trojans have been operating under scholarship restrictions for years. From 2008 to 2010, USC signed three consecutive classes consisting of just 18 players apiece (54 players in all), well below the 25-man maximum. Another reason: Attrition since the end of the 2011 season — including former blue chips Kyle Prater, Dillon Baxter, Patrick Hall, T.J. Bryant, Amir Carlisle and Brice Butler — has freed up enough room to max out the number of signees under the sanctions.

    In fact, with four early enrollees in the incoming class (who count against last year's scholarship caps) already on campus, a full 15-man haul would give the Trojans one more signee than they had in any of Carroll's final three classes from 2008-10.

    Of course, what Kiffin can't say outright is that a roster with "roughly 80" scholarship players will have to find a way to shed a handful of them between now and August to fall in line with the sanctions, which means the exodus from the bottom of the depth chart isn't over by a long shot. (Nick Saban may be available to offer his expert advice on this subject, for a small consulting fee.) But it also means, barring a catastrophic rash of injuries, that we're going to be hearing a lot less about those missing schollies than anyone would have guessed two years ago.

    - - -
    Matt Hinton is on Facebook and Twitter: Follow him @DrSaturday.

    Watch Full Count!
     

    41 comments

    • Andy  •  Richmond, Virginia  •  3 months ago
      75 scholarships for a school like USC is still quite a bit. They just have to actually recruit a little harder and committ to the players (Academically and Developmentally) they recruit and not throw them out with the bath water when they do not perform like they thought they would (like LSU, BAMA and the rest of the crony teams that prey on young men for wins and money).

      USC should be able to win with 60 considering the level of players they get coming out of High School.
      • Joseph B 3 months ago
        Wow a whole lot said about Bama and LSU, when they are caught they are not allowd to compete, say what you want about Jefferson he did not play until the Judge made him eligable, however a whole lot of accusation coming from a Notorious Place like A USC FAN! Didn't see either of those two universities FORFIT ANYTHING Like USC!
    • DAVID H  •  Tampa, Florida  •  3 months ago
      USC hardly ever has had a full 85 schollies at school usally between 78 to 82, Matt is correct in this is the year that SC would have felt the most pain because of the lower schollies but most importanly because the NCAA let all Sr,s and Jr,s leave the team. Those wishing the fall of Troy( sorry for your disappointment.
      • Dave R 3 months ago
        i was unaware they had risen
      • Jesse 3 months ago
        derrrrr 10-2 means they HAVE risen, mr. m.i.t. grad....
    • chj  •  Springfield, Missouri  •  3 months ago
      USC recruiting!! We are blessed!!! Good job coaches!!!!!
    • Scott  •  Irvine, California  •  3 months ago
      So now that scholarships are on a year to year basis, can SC rotate players on and off schlarship. An example would be Matt Barkley, family has money and he has already graduated and is attending grad school. How many units does he need to be eligable. Can he give up his scholarship in favor of a younger player. I will bet there are 5 jr.s and sr.s that can do that.
      • RDS 3 months ago
        Scholarships have always been on a year to year basis per the NCAA, technically. But the school still controls the player after that year and has to give them a release to leave.
      • J 3 months ago
        yes you can do that...
      • John 3 months ago
        Good one. I didn't even think about that. I bet that Barkley could and would give up a scholarship. Others as well, maybe.
    • RPRII  •  3 months ago
      I believe, hope, that Coach Kiffin's "secret" plan is to follow the path set by John McKay . . . go after the "stand-out" JC players . . . proven ability and willing to keep up their grades . . . why spend your valuable scholarships on a high school "wonder" that might have already peaked and is just looking for a "free ride" . . . more often the case than not.
    • J.  •  Tallahassee, Florida  •  3 months ago
      It is possible to hide players with other scholarships...like track and baseball. Not saying that this is happening, but you never know.
      • jim 3 months ago
        Nope. if you play football, then the scholarship from another sport transfers over to football and counts against the football scholarship numbers. This is per NCAA rules.
      • John 3 months ago
        Jim is right. That is NCAA policy. They do it that way, beacause if there is abuse, it usually rolls toward the football program. Can't get around it. It's all documented.
    • Doug W  •  3 months ago
      Go Kiffin....We of Troy have become believers....Keep it up.
    • Dario  •  Los Angeles, California  •  3 months ago
      Kiffin is a genius recruiter!
      • Jesse 3 months ago
        actually, the ace recruiter for sc is ed orgeron....
    • Paul  •  Roslyn, New York  •  3 months ago
      I miss Homer Jones
    • Philippe  •  Bellevue, Washington  •  3 months ago
      Fight on, for ol' SC, Fight on, to VICTORY. Go Trojans! USC rocks!
    • Luis  •  Los Angeles, California  •  3 months ago
      the usc trojans will be kicking major tail in the up coming couple years ....\

      get your tickets while they are hot ,if you can....

      clearly name recognition is paramount here .........

      football players still want to ball up at usc,bowl elegible or not....

      and what does matt barckley's desision say about usc?

      what sort of impact does tha.haven on recruiting........retorical
    • TROJAN NATTY  •  Los Pinos, Mexico  •  3 months ago
      Teams need 85 and more,they need bodys, Its not if but when players get hurt. USC has been lucky because the best players want to go there because USC puts more players in the pros than anybody.period. But even those 5 stars do not pan out. USC had 17 5 star recruits between 07-10 and 12 of them are BUSTS. Walkons will be valuable for USC this yr.
    • Denise M  •  New York, New York  •  3 months ago
      USC is proving you don't need 85 scholarship players to compete( hard to believe,but they blew out Washington using only 45 players). And the NCAA has taken notice.They're proposing in 2014 that the scholarship limit be dropped to 80 for all schools.
    • albert r  •  Brea, California  •  3 months ago
      What happened to Matt Hinton? He went from ripping the Trojans on a weekly basis 18 months ago, to now calling the NCAA's sanctions "heavy handed," and writing objective and thoughtful stories on the team.

      If i had to guess, I would say that his Yahoo management is now allowing Matt to write what he wants to write. Their agenda seems to be gone in regards to USC.
    • scuba steve  •  Phoenix, Arizona  •  3 months ago
      usc 2012 south division champions! OREGON 2012 PAC 12 CHAMPIONS! 4TH IN A ROW!
    • paterno  •  3 months ago
      Still enough to beat oregon.
    • Me  •  3 months ago
      Its called "cheating", again. Signing more players then they are allowed, something the SEC does on a consitent basis. Why doesn't the NCAA crack down on this?
    • beano  •  Atlanta, Georgia  •  3 months ago
      Why have they anointed Lane K as such a great coach? He has yet to really prove anything..... Not saying he wont or he isn't just that he needs to prove himself!!!
    • Geo  •  New York, New York  •  3 months ago
      Who on earth thought that this "was supposed to be the year the Trojans really felt the bite"? No one that had any sense.

      The big bite will be felt in 2014 and 15 when there is absolutely no depth on the roster. If you are totally relying on a roster full of true freshmen, then you are lucky to have a season like Clemson in 2011, not a Championship year.
    • Joseph B  •  Ville Platte, Louisiana  •  3 months ago
      Can you say probation in 4 years , Kiffin if left at Tennesee would have them on probation by now, Do you people not remember even when he was coach at USC he was called before the investigations committee for things he had done at Tennessee. Better enjoy next year I have a feeling in 2 more seasons USC wil be back on the map for all the wrong reasons.