Buzzing on Yahoo Sports:

J.E. Skeets

BDL's 2009-10 NBA Preview: Portland Trail Blazers

Ball Don't Lie

View gallery

.

Once again back is the incredible ... Ball Don't Lie's NBA previews, outlining off-season moves, projecting win totals, spinning tracks and much, much more. It's a fun, hot mess. And now, the Portland Trail Blazers.

2008-09 Record: 54-28, second place in Northwest Division
Head Coach/Facial Hair: Nate McMillan/'Stache
Key Additions: Andre Miller(notes), Juwan Howard(notes), Dante Cunningham(notes), Jeff Pendergraph(notes)
Key Losses: Sergio Rodriguez(notes), Channing Frye(notes), Shavlik Randolph(notes), Mike Ruffin, Raef LaFrentz's(notes) expired contract

Portland fans probably won't like the win total listed at the bottom of the preview. Go ahead, you can sneak a look. Just scroll back up when you're done, you dirty hippie.

It's not egregious, the predicted record. I'm not calling for the Trail Blazers to fall off the face the Earth. In fact, I'm adding a win to their 2008-09 win total, a season that saw them win fewer games than the team's point differential suggested.

But it is just one more win, for a team expected to do big things. Sixty-win things. Championship things.

View gallery

.
Why? I'm having a hard time telling you. This is a championship-caliber team, even though it couldn't get out of the first round last season. It's loaded, it has more talent than last season, and I wouldn't be surprised in the slightest if the Blazers eventually racked up those 60 wins. Or more.

So why just one more? Injuries, I guess, but I'm not going to pretend to know who randomly gets hurt this season. Andre Miller might pout a bit, but even if he is out of shape and reliving his time spent with the Los Angeles Clippers back during 2002-03, he can't be any worse than the backup point guards that Portland trotted out last season. Really, there's no reason.

It's just how I think it shakes out. The West is stacked, again, and wins are going to be hard to come by. Do you really want to take some wins away from the Lakers or Spurs and hand them to the Trail Blazers ... just ‘cause? I don't.

The team will be much better in 2009-10. The offseason included picking up a few rookies who won't play and essentially trading Sergio Rodriguez for Miller, and that's about it. Every other step up will come from internal development.

For most teams, that's a bit of a bummer. When your team boasts Brandon Roy(notes) (possibly the league's most underappreciated superstar), LaMarcus Aldridge(notes) and Greg Oden(notes), this is a great thing. To say nothing of Martell Webster(notes), Travis Outlaw(notes), Rudy Fernandez(notes) or (especially) Nicolas Batum(notes). This team is loaded with great young players, and I don't even really care for Jerryd Bayless(notes).

And every year, until they hit their prime, youngsters take their production up a step as compared with the season before. And the Trail Blazers? Every player on the Blazers, who was a Blazers last season, will be better than the year before. Every one. That's so huge.

I don't like to be in the business of sussing out the spring while sitting in the midst of October, but I honestly think Portland is the clear No. 2 in the West. Better than San Antonio, better than Denver, better than anyone else.

I don't have them winning as much as the Spurs in the regular season, for whatever reason, but I think they have the best chance at knocking off the Lakers. This team could go from the lottery to a championship in just two years.

Everyone's got to stay on point, though. Everyone has to be willing to walk the million-mile journey and stay focused, and I think Nate McMillan's the sort of guy who can keep that focus for this (still, very) young team. I'm not worried about Portland taking a step back. Roy's too good, in all areas. With Oden in shape, he'll truly shape up that iffy Trail Blazer defense. The depth is there, the scoring is the best in the league per possession, and we're still early in this particular game.

This is the year of the second big jump, Portland. Just don't measure it by regular-season win total.

Prediction: 55-27

Kelly Dwyer

View gallery

.

If signing Andre Miller is the biggest move, can the Blazers take the next step?

Unless the team has the worst luck in the world — and considering Greg Oden, Bill Walton and Sam Bowie's history, this isn't completely out of the realm of possibility — Portland's internal development, along with the addition of Miller, should be enough. And if Oden is able to play, say, 33 minutes a game and not sit out for more than a few games in 2009-10, the team's defense could jump up to the ranks of the above-average. Paired with what was statistically the best offense in the NBA last year, this could mean 60 or more wins even with no All-Star additions.

— KD, Yahoo! Sports 2009-10 NBA Preview magazine

View gallery

.

Blazersedge: "Anything short of a division title and the second round of the playoffs would be a disappointment. Management, coaches and players have all set the bar that high, and they've done so with a confidence that borders on cockiness. Management feels they have assembled the right personnel (and lots of it!), the coaches feel they've added experience and savvy to a talented group of youngsters, and the players feel like they have something to prove after getting booted out of the first round by a tougher, more determined Houston Rockets team. Pretty simple, really. There are other goals: Aldridge and Oden want to make the All-Star team, Roy wants to be all-defense, a few Blazers reserves could be in the running for Sixth Man of the Year, but those awards and accolades aren't the focus." [more]

Rip City Project: "Adding a passer like Miller to the most efficient offense in the NBA should, in theory, only increase Portland's effectiveness, but Nate McMillan has experimented with tempo and lineups in the preseason, leading to offensive inconsistency thus far. Much of the Blazers' success with the ball last season was tied to them being the best offensive rebounding team in the league thanks to having centers with the No. 1 (Joel Przybilla(notes)) and No. 8 (Oden) players in terms of rebound rate. It's tempting to say size, youth or depth is Portland's greatest strength, but it should be versatility. As the Blazers found out against Houston last season, matchups are key in the playoffs and by adding Miller and getting a healthy Martell Webster along with the natural progression of the younger players McMillan should have a specific lineup available for any situation." [more]

Blaze of Love: "For a team that rattled off 54 wins last season, they have some pretty glaring weaknesses that teams could easily exploit. When you ask for a poster child of poor pick-and-roll defense, you'll see the gigantic frowning face of Nate McMillan. It doesn't matter which pick-and-roll defensive scheme is decided upon because you'll see zero success with this team running any of them. Let's also not forget that the Blazers are below average in their transition defense and struggle with turnovers on a nightly basis. Plus, they can't seem to get anyone to turn on the burners and push the ball for any easy buckets of their own. I haven't looked at the numbers, but Portland has got to be one of the lowest teams in the NBA for fast-break points. Andre Miller should help to increase those numbers." [more]

Britney Spears, "I'm Not A Girl, Not Yet A Woman"

The Blazers have now entered that weird place where they're past the point of "young, up-and-coming team," but aren't quite true championship-contender material. Kevin Pritchard has done a fantastic job of assembling talent, and now we wait and see whether they end up like the 2006-07 Bulls or win a playoff series or two. At the very least, they could be due for some winsome singing on a desert rock structure. That's something all good teams do.

— Trey Kerby, The Blowtorch

You have to take the bad with the good when it comes to the Blazers and fantasy impact. The team has an enviable collection of talent but also boasts one of the league's deepest rotations, something that serves to limit the ceiling of a number of players. Two who are above the fray: Brandon Roy and LaMarcus Aldridge. Roy is a superstar in every sense of the word — he's highly productive, consistent, reliable and efficient. You can feel good about rostering his balanced line somewhere near the end of Round 1. Aldridge hasn't quite reached superstar status, but he's quite good and efficient in his own right. While the defensive stats may never fully come around, he does well enough on offense and overall to warrant serious consideration by the time Round 4 arrives.

Much of the attention currently payed to the team centers around Greg Oden's potential development. His offseason workout regimen was designed to increase his agility and limit his fouls, a fatal flaw during his first season (8.7 per 48 minutes). He's looked very good in preseason and could take a big step forward in 09-10 — it's certainly worth finding out if he will around pick 100. Joel Przybilla is a per-minute stud and is capable of reprising his role in a platoon if Oden isn't ready to take ownership of the position. Point guard is looking a bit messy, as Nate McMillan has balked at removing Steve Blake(notes) from the starting five for Andre Miller. Miller looks like a solid fit for the team and will likely emerge with the majority of the minutes, but it's hard to be overly optimistic, given what's gone on so far. Rudy Fernandez, Nicolas Batum, Martell Webster and Travis Outlaw round out the rotation, but none sees enough minutes individually to warrant anything but late-round consideration in standard leagues.

— Matt Buser, Yahoo! Sports Fantasy Basketball / BuserSports.com

Sign up now for Fantasy Basketball '09.

SirPaulAllen: We've had some tough times, but we've hung in there. I mean ... LOOK AT MY BOAT! — http://bit.ly/2Cp1RT
6:59 PM Oct 17th from Tweetie

*******

Atlantic Divison: Celtics | Nets | Knicks | 76ers | Raptors
Southwest Division: Mavericks | Rockets | Grizzlies | Hornets | Spurs
Central Division: Bulls | Cavaliers | Pistons | Pacers | Bucks
Northwest Division: Nuggets | Wolves | Thunder

View Comments (0)