YOUR FRIENDS' ACTIVITY

    Discover Yahoo! With Your Friends

    Explore news, videos, and much more based on what your friends are reading and watching. Publish your own activity and retain full control.

    To get started, first
    Big League Stew

    Ryan Braun wins appeal of 50-game suspension

    Ryan Braun will not be suspended for 50 games to start the season. (Getty)They say there's a first for everything.

    And Milwaukee Brewers outfielder Ryan Braun has just become the first big leaguer to ever successfully win the public appeal of a suspension that was the result of a positive drug test. Tom Haudricourt of the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel was the first to report the news on Thursday afternoon.

    Haudricourt reports that Braun won his appeal "not so much on contesting the result of the test but the testing process itself, some kind of technicality." The New York Daily News says Braun's team challenged the chain of custody that the urine sample from his October test went through.

    UPDATE: According to the sources of Yahoo! Sports' Jeff Passan, Braun's urine sample sat in a FedEx shop over the weekend, challenging the integrity of the sample. Passan's sources also report that the chain-of-custody loophole will be closed in an amendment to the league's drug-testing program.

    As a result, the reigning NL MVP won't be suspended 50 games to start the season and he'll report to the team's camp in Maryvale, Ariz., on Friday with the prospect of an uninterrupted season before him.

    "It is the first step in restoring my good name and reputation," Braun said in a statement. "We were able to get through this because I am innocent."

    As you might imagine after reading Haudricourt's report, Major League Baseball isn't too happy with having its drug test system questioned and exposed. In the wake of the third-party arbitrator's decision, the league issued a release saying as much.

    "As a part of our drug testing program, the Commissioner's Office and the Players Association agreed to a neutral third party review for instances that are under dispute," it read. " While we have always respected that process, Major League Baseball vehemently disagrees with the decision rendered today by arbitrator Shyam Das."

    Of course, if the process had been respected from the start, the results of Braun's original test would have never been leaked to ESPN back in December. His appeals process would have remained confidential and we never would have had two months of Braun maintaining his innocence while others debated if he should surrender his MVP award to Matt Kemp. Braun was not afforded the same confidential process that others who have tested positive have been afforded and that remains the injustice that was at the root of this story.

    But what's done is done and thankfully that third party did its job properly and ignored whatever the court of public opinion was saying or was being led to believe. That sound you heard was fantasy draft boards being rearranged across the country ...

    Spring training has started, so don't miss a beat ...
    Follow @bigleaguestew@KevinKaduk and the BLS Facebook page!

    Other popular content on Yahoo! Sports:
    Dan Wetzel: Daytona 500 wreck proves Danica Patrick's toughness
    Broncos coach denies rift between Tim Tebow, Brady Quinn
    Video: Jim Harbaugh moonlights as Indiana basketball's 'student' manager
    Video: Will Duke or North Carolina squeeze into another No. 1 seed?

     
    • sam spade  •  Chicago, Illinois  •  2 months ago
      Let's do GAPP? Generally Accepted Procedures of a Profession. Everypone who's involved knows the GAPP. They know the must follow GAPP or the test is thrown out. The reason is the possibility of cross contamination. So the person who took the sample was fully awzare of GAPP. They knowingly and willingly admitted that the violated GAPP. So he's innocent. The problem lies with the media. Every time thbere's this leak, whether it's secret grand jury testimony as in the Bonds case or this leaked test, i know that they can't convict that person in a legally approved manner. You know something's wrong. If they could convict whoever ethically and legally, then there would be no need to leak. They leak because the only conviction they can get is in the Court of Public opinion. What's happened to Braun is wrong.
      • Big Boss is a Badass 2 months ago
        If I had a dollar for every time you said "GAPP". I would have five dollars that I did not have before.
    • Vinnie  •  New York, New York  •  2 months ago
      Whether Braun is a PED-juicer or not, innocent or Guilty... That's irrelevant. MLB didn't follow the process they established and it bit them in the butts. Didn't help someone leaked the story to ESPN and caused the insanity in the first place. That's why there is an appeals process and if there is anything that can contribute the slightest of doubt then it should be recognized
    • The Unsilent Majority  •  2 months ago
      Now everyone knows, if you want to do roids, just do so much of them that the arbitrator won't believe the ratio could possibly be real.
    • The Unsilent Majority  •  2 months ago
      It's always funny when you have a "leak" in a story regarding a urine sample.
    • JeremyM  •  Columbus, Ohio  •  2 months ago
      He fought the only fight a player is allowed to fight in this case. The lab is above reproach according to how the system is set up. He can't fight the fact that the sample tested positive. It did! He can't simply swear he's innocent and leave it at that. If he knows he did not take anything illegal he can only assume there was a mistake made somewhere in the process and that's the only argument he can make. How does he prove he's innocent if he doesn't know how/why the test was positive?
      • Dr. Bill 2 months ago
        well put
      • Glenn 2 months ago
        Agreed!
      • mikez 2 months ago
        Well put... But he's still a douche
    • Tim  •  Ames, Iowa  •  2 months ago
      Braun was taking enzyte
    • southside mike  •  2 months ago
      Sorry. Getting off, on a chain of custody technicality, is not the same as being innocent!
      • nathan 2 months ago
        gotta agree.....sorta like OJ. The LAPD screwed up the evidence so bad that there was a tad bit of doubt.
      • Duane 2 months ago
        Yes sir it is...cuz he could be innocent as easy as guilty. Chain of custody is supposed to insure integrity....hmmm....exactly why they tested.
      • Ivan 2 months ago
        Duane-So you think someone at Fed Ex switched his sample for one with higher testosteron? This is the worst possible result for baseball. You have the commissioners team and MVP get off on a #$%$ argument.
    • David Faubion  •  Agoura Hills, California  •  2 months ago
      Braun's use of PED or not, Matt Kemp performed better at the plate, on the bases and in center-field, the power position in the outfield. Braun plays the easier left-field position. Kemp still deserves the MVP. Braun should be a good sport and hand it over to him. Without Kemp, the LA Dodgers would have gotten nowhere, even with Clayton Kershaw. In fact, Clayton might not have won his Cy Young award sans Matty.

      In terms of certain rules and policies, MLB has some credibility issues. For example, it just hurts the game to see a ground-rule double turned into an out when a fan interferes with the trajectory of the hit ball. Either move the front row of the bleachers back or make the event of that a ground-rule.
    • Justme  •  2 months ago
      I see the idiots who really know nothing about the process are shooting their mouths off.
      • M 2 months ago
        Does it surprise you? They are blissfully ignorant the process, yet smugly judgmental. That is a fine combination.
    • shadow  •  Ottawa, Canada  •  2 months ago
      getting off on a technicality leaves an aura of doubt of his innocence...i'm guessing the fans of opposing teams will hammer him all season long.
    • mike  •  Washington, Michigan  •  2 months ago
      people are stating that he never tested positive before. well that is stupid as it gets....there is always a first time.
    • J  •  Niagara Falls, Canada  •  2 months ago
      People. Not all the facts are listed here. From the USA TODAY article notice the 'impossibly elevated' comment. It sounds like no one could have that amount of TEST in their body. Either way we've got to wait a few weeks if not months for more information.

      From USA TODAY: Two people close to Braun and familiar with his appeal, but unauthorized to speak publicly about the process, acknowledge the sample collection was flawed. But they contend there were several factors in Braun's succesful grievance. There was no other proof that he took an illegal substance, and his 20/1 TE ratio [hormone testosterone to the hormone epitestosterone], they said, was impossibly elevated for an acceptable sample. A TE ratio of less than 4/1 is considered normal.
    • Jeremy H  •  Southfield, Michigan  •  2 months ago
      Is that why the mock drafts aren't working?
    • CrisLander  •  Madrid, Spain  •  2 months ago
      This does not prove Braun's innocence. This only proves that the chain of custody wasn't applied correctly. It's just a technicality.

      Should I be concerned about Braun this season? He'll play the full season, but will his numbers dip in relation to last year, due to probably being under closer monitoring for PEDs? That might be a concern for fantasy teams...
    • Justme  •  2 months ago
      Guilty?....See, we have to try every case in the court of the uneducated public opinion. Guilt before innocence.
      Innocent?.....Conspiracy theories.
    • AnthonyG  •  2 months ago
      Okay, give Ryan the benefit of the doubt. But if he stinks it up this year, we'll all know why.
    • OkiKowai  •  McLean, Virginia  •  2 months ago
      People, the news groups are leaving out two major points. Braun's argument was that due to procedures not being followed, it is very possible that the urine tested was not his. Also, he requested MLB do a DNA test to verify whether the urine being tested was his for sure, they denied this request. From this information alone, I believe he is truly innocent. Maybe he requested the DNA test knowing it would be turned down, but that is MLB's fault for not taking him up on it. But based on his past, and people really should be innocent until proven guilty, I believe he is innocent.
    • Doc10  •  2 months ago
      The way I see it, all previous tests, were negative, the follow-up test was negative, and the only positive test was tainted. I say give the guy more scrutiny, but it's tough to call him a cheater based on that evidence. His stats have been consistent over his career, and he never bulked up at all like Giambi, Bonds, Sosa, Canseco, etc.
    • Kevdogg  •  San Diego, California  •  2 months ago
      Cool, cheating gets overturned, so what do you call it then? They challenged the integrity of the sample? Yeah, thats right people. INTEGRITY!!!
    • A Yahoo! User  •  New York, New York  •  2 months ago
      Just another cheater. I miss the days when Keith Hernandez and Darryl Strawberry did NON-performance enhancing drugs.

    Yahoo! Sports Authors